Cited by 68Robotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage

Towards simultaneous recognition, localization and mapping for hand-held and wearable cameras

Castle, R O, Gawley, D J, Klein, G, Murray, D W·2007·Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation

Abstract

This paper presents a system which combines single-camera SLAM (simultaneous localization and mapping) with established methods for feature recognition. Besides using standard salient image features to build an on-line map of the camera's environment, this system is capable of identifying and localizing known planar objects in the scene, and incorporating their geometry into the world map. Continued measurement of these mapped objects improves both the accuracy of estimated maps and the robustness of the tracking system. In the context of hand-held or wearable vision, the system's ability to enhance generated maps with known objects increases the map's value to human operators, and also enables meaningful automatic annotation of the user's surroundings. The presented solution lies between the high order enriching of maps such as scene classification, and the efforts to introduce higher geometric primitives such as lines into probabilistic maps.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/robot.2007.364109

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Castle, R. O., Gawley, D. J., Klein, G., & Murray, D. W.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2007-04
Pages
4102-4107
ISSN
1050-4729 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2131946505
Cited by
68
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
13.33
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Keywords
SLAM, feature recognition, object recognition, wearable cameras, handheld camera, visual object tracking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review