Improving the activity recognition using GMAF and transfer learning in post-stroke rehabilitation assessment
Abstract
An important part of developing a performant assessment algorithm for post-stroke rehabilitation is to achieve a high-precision activity recognition. Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) are known to give very accurate results, however they require the data to be of a specific structure that differs from the sequential time-series format typically collected from wearable sensors. In this paper, we describe models to improve the activity recognition using the CNN classifier. At first by modifying the Gramian angular field algorithm by encoding all the sensors' channels from a single time window into a single 2D image allows to map the maximum activity characteristics. Feeding the resulting images to a simple 1D CNN classifier improves the accuracy of the test data from 94% for the traditional segmentation approach to 97.06%. Subsequently, we convert the 2D images into the RGB format and use a 2D CNN classifier. This results in increasing the test data accuracy to 97.52%. Finally, we employ transfer learning with the popular VGG_16 model to the RGB images, which yields to improving the accuracy further more to reach 98.53%.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Other included works only used able-bodied participants.
“Other works only used AB [41,42,50]”
From Wearable sensors and machine learning in post-stroke rehabilitation assessment: A systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as [50]
Convolutional Neural Network architectures were employed in included works.
“Another ANN architecture that was employed is Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) Architectures [43,45,50,54].”
From Wearable sensors and machine learning in post-stroke rehabilitation assessment: A systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as [50]
Boukhennoufa et al. encoded sequential data into images and employed VGG-16 to achieve a very high accuracy.
“Boukhennoufa et.al [50], encoded the sequential data into images and then employed a popular CNN architecture which is the VGG-16 to then achieve a very high accuracy.”
From Wearable sensors and machine learning in post-stroke rehabilitation assessment: A systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as [50]
In study [50], the VGG16 model achieved 98.53% accuracy.
“VGG16 98.53%”
From Wearable sensors and machine learning in post-stroke rehabilitation assessment: A systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as [50]
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155 · see citing works
A Comparative Study on Human Activity Recognition Using Inertial Sensors in a Smartphone
Wang, A., Chen, G., Yang, J., Zhao, S., & Chang, C.-Y. (2016) · IEEE Sensors Journal · doi:10.1109/jsen.2016.2545708 · Cited by 324 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wearable sensors and machine learning in post-stroke rehabilitation assessment: A systematic review
Boukhennoufa, I., Zhai, X., Utti, V., Jackson, J., & McDonald-Maier, K. D. (2022) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2021.103197 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
“As per the academic citations of the included papers, it ranged from no citations at all [50,58,60,64] to 126 citations [56] (up to August 2021).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citation
- Authors
- Boukhennoufa, I., Zhai, X., McDonald-Maier, K. D., Utti, V., & Jackson, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Essex (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Zhai, Xiaojun
- Venue
- 2021 IEEE 19th World Symposium on Applied Machine Intelligence and Informatics (SAMI)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2021-01-21
- Pages
- 000391-000398
- OpenAlex
- W3126681358
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 1.31
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE World Symposium on Applied Machine Intelligence and Informatics (SAMI) (publishedVersion)
- Open Access at Essex (University of Essex) (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/R02572X/1,EP/P017487/1,EP/P015956/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
- Keywords
- activity recognition, stroke rehabilitation, Gramian Angular Field, time series classification, wearable sensors, transfer learning, VGG16, convolutional neural networks, stroke rehabilitation assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review