Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 16

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

G-Repo: a Tool to Support MSR Studies on GitHub

Romano, Simone, Caulo, Maria, Buompastore, Matteo, Guerra, Leonardo, Mounsif, Anas, Telesca, Michele, Baldassarre, Maria Teresa, Scanniello, Giuseppe·2021·2021 IEEE International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER)

Abstract

GitHub currently hosts more than 100 million public repositories. This has made it very popular to conduct Mining Software Repositories (MSR) studies. Researchers have been exploiting the information stored in GitHub (e.g., commits, pull requests, or issues) to investigate both developer- and project-related aspects. GitHub provides the REST API to make queries without cloning repositories. In this tool-demo paper, we highlight some issues we noticed when conducting an MSR study on GitHub by using the REST API and present G-Repo: a tool developed to support researchers when tackling these issues able to ease the creation of datasets for MSR studies. Also, we provide a manually-annotated dataset with information about the kind and the (spoken) languages of 1,500 repositories hosted on GitHub. A video showing the functioning of G-Repo is available at: https://youtu.be/mb9CIALBFZk.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/saner50967.2021.00064

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 16

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. 10.1109/ICCSA.2013.22 · DOI
  2. 10.1145/3236024.3264598 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1145/3417990.3422006 · doi:10.1145/3417990.3422006
  4. steinbeck, 2020, Mining version control systems and issue trackers with libvcs4j, Proc of International Conference on Software Analysis Evolution and Reengineering, 647
  5. 10.1109/ICSE-Companion.2019.00043 · DOI
  6. 10.1007/s10664-018-9660-3 · DOI
  7. 10.1007/978-3-030-64148-1_22 · DOI
  8. 10.1007/s11219-016-9347-1 · DOI
  9. 10.1145/2597073.2597123 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/s10664-015-9393-5 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1109/TSE.2017.2653105 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1007/s13748-018-0147-7 · DOI
  13. 10.1109/ICPC.2019.00019 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1109/TSE.2018.2842781 · DOI
  15. 10.1145/3387904.3389270 · DOI
  16. 10.1109/FOSM.2008.4659248 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1016/j.infsof.2020.106274 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Romano, S., Caulo, M., Buompastore, M., Guerra, L., Mounsif, A., Telesca, M., Baldassarre, M. T., & Scanniello, G.
Venue
2021 IEEE International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-03
Pages
551-555
Cited by
16

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: G-Repo: a Tool to Support MSR Studies on GitHub. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/saner50967.2021.00064
The paper
Romano, S., Caulo, M., Buompastore, M., Guerra, L., Mounsif, A., Telesca, M., Baldassarre, M. T., & Scanniello, G. (2021). G-Repo: a Tool to Support MSR Studies on GitHub. 2021 IEEE International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER). https://doi.org/10.1109/saner50967.2021.00064

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.