The DOI matches its Crossref record.
How to Distribute the Detection Load among Virtual Machines to Maximize the Detection of Distributed Attacks in the Cloud?
Abstract
Security has been identified to be the principal stumbling-block preventing users and enterprises from moving their businesses to the cloud. The reason is that cloud systems, besides inheriting all the vulnerabilities of the traditional computing systems, appeal to new types of threats engendered mainly by the virtualization concept that allows multiple users' virtual machines (VMs) to share a common computing platform. This broadens the attack space of the malicious users and increases their ability to attack both the cloud system and other co-resident VMs. Motivated by the absence of any approach that addresses the problem of optimal detection load distribution in the domain of cloud computing, we develop a resource-aware maxmin game theoretical model that guides the hypervisor on how the detection load should be optimally distributed among its guest VMs in the real-time. The objective is to maximize the hypervisor's probability of detection, knowing that the attacker is dividing the attack over several VMs to minimize this probability. Experimental results on Amazon EC2 pricing dataset reveal that our model increases the probability of detecting distributed attacks, reduces the false positives, and minimizes the resources wasted during the detection process.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
IoT devices and networks are highly vulnerable to security attacks that target data integrity and service availability.
“Unfortunately, IoT devices and networks are known to be highly vulnerable to security attacks that target data integrity and service availability.”
From Deep learning-enabled anomaly detection for IoT systems (2023) · cites this paper as [8]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- wahab, 2015, Mis-behavior detection framework for community-based cloud computing, FiCloud, 181
- 10.1145/2433140.2433151 · DOI
- ferguson, 2008, Game theory text, Mathematics Department UCLA
- 10.1109/ICPPW.2010.46 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICDCSW.2012.61 · DOI
- 10.15837/ijccc.2013.1.170 · DOI
- 10.1145/2046707.2046754 · DOI
- luenberger, 1973, Introduction to Linear and Nonlinear Programming, 28
- 10.1016/j.dss.2015.04.009 · DOI
- 10.1109/CLOUD.2010.23 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jnca.2010.06.008 · DOI
- 10.1145/1653662.1653687 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICCNC.2014.6785472 · DOI
- 10.1109/DASC.2011.128 · DOI
- 10.1109/SCC.2015.36 · DOI
- wahab, 0, Towards trustworthy multi-cloud services communities: A trust-based hedonic coalitional game, IEEE Transactions on Services Computing 2016
- 10.1109/CloudCom.2013.164 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Deep learning-enabled anomaly detection for IoT systems
Abusitta, A., de Carvalho, G. H. S., Wahab, O. A., Halabi, T., Fung, B. C. M., & Mamoori, S. A. (2023) · Internet of Things · doi:10.1016/j.iot.2022.100656 · Cited by 184
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wahab, O. A., Bentahar, J., Otrok, H., & Mourad, A.
- Affiliations
- Concordia University (CA)
- Khalifa University of Science and Technology (AE)
- Lebanese American University (LB)
- Venue
- 2016 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing (SCC)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2016-06
- Pages
- 316-323
- OpenAlex
- W2514625588
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 0.90
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE International Conference on Services Computing (publishedVersion)
- PolyPublie (École Polytechnique de Montréal) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Security and Verification in Computing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Data Security Solutions
- Keywords
- cloud security, virtual machine isolation, distributed attacks, intrusion detection, hypervisor, false positives, virtualization security, Amazon EC2
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review