Cited by 19Security and Verification in ComputingNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionCloud Data Security Solutions

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

How to Distribute the Detection Load among Virtual Machines to Maximize the Detection of Distributed Attacks in the Cloud?

Wahab, Omar Abdel, Bentahar, Jamal, Otrok, Hadi, Mourad, Azzam·2016·2016 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing (SCC)

Abstract

Security has been identified to be the principal stumbling-block preventing users and enterprises from moving their businesses to the cloud. The reason is that cloud systems, besides inheriting all the vulnerabilities of the traditional computing systems, appeal to new types of threats engendered mainly by the virtualization concept that allows multiple users' virtual machines (VMs) to share a common computing platform. This broadens the attack space of the malicious users and increases their ability to attack both the cloud system and other co-resident VMs. Motivated by the absence of any approach that addresses the problem of optimal detection load distribution in the domain of cloud computing, we develop a resource-aware maxmin game theoretical model that guides the hypervisor on how the detection load should be optimally distributed among its guest VMs in the real-time. The objective is to maximize the hypervisor's probability of detection, knowing that the attacker is dividing the attack over several VMs to minimize this probability. Experimental results on Amazon EC2 pricing dataset reveal that our model increases the probability of detecting distributed attacks, reduces the false positives, and minimizes the resources wasted during the detection process.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/scc.2016.48

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • IoT devices and networks are highly vulnerable to security attacks that target data integrity and service availability.

    “Unfortunately, IoT devices and networks are known to be highly vulnerable to security attacks that target data integrity and service availability.”

    From Deep learning-enabled anomaly detection for IoT systems (2023) · cites this paper as [8]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. wahab, 2015, Mis-behavior detection framework for community-based cloud computing, FiCloud, 181
  2. 10.1145/2433140.2433151 · DOI
  3. ferguson, 2008, Game theory text, Mathematics Department UCLA
  4. 10.1109/ICPPW.2010.46 · DOI
  5. 10.1109/ICDCSW.2012.61 · DOI
  6. 10.15837/ijccc.2013.1.170 · DOI
  7. 10.1145/2046707.2046754 · DOI
  8. luenberger, 1973, Introduction to Linear and Nonlinear Programming, 28
  9. 10.1016/j.dss.2015.04.009 · DOI
  10. 10.1109/CLOUD.2010.23 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.jnca.2010.06.008 · DOI
  12. 10.1145/1653662.1653687 · DOI
  13. 10.1109/ICCNC.2014.6785472 · DOI
  14. 10.1109/DASC.2011.128 · DOI
  15. 10.1109/SCC.2015.36 · DOI
  16. wahab, 0, Towards trustworthy multi-cloud services communities: A trust-based hedonic coalitional game, IEEE Transactions on Services Computing 2016
  17. 10.1109/CloudCom.2013.164 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wahab, O. A., Bentahar, J., Otrok, H., & Mourad, A.
Affiliations
  • Concordia University (CA)
  • Khalifa University of Science and Technology (AE)
  • Lebanese American University (LB)
Venue
2016 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing (SCC)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2016-06
Pages
316-323
OpenAlex
W2514625588
Cited by
19
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.90
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE International Conference on Services Computing (publishedVersion)
  • PolyPublie (École Polytechnique de Montréal) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Security and Verification in Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Data Security Solutions
Keywords
cloud security, virtual machine isolation, distributed attacks, intrusion detection, hypervisor, false positives, virtualization security, Amazon EC2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review