The Past, Present, and Future of Research on the Continuous Development of AI
Open accessAbstract
Since 2020, 33 literature reviews have systematically synthesized research on the continuous development of AI, also known as Machine Learning Operations (MLOps), reflecting the increasing prevalence of AI models across various fields and the multifaceted challenges in their development, integration, and deployment. Yet, the lack of comprehensive analysis of these literature reviews and their covered topics complicates selecting relevant ones and anticipating future trends and research. In addition, these literature reviews gathered related 1397 primary sources to describe aspects of AI's continuous development, integration, and deployment, posing a hidden gem to gain insights into the past and present work and derive insights into the future of AI's continuous development. With this work, we 1) systematically collected and summarised 33 literature reviews via a Multivocal Literature Review (MLR) that focus on the continuous development, deployment, and integration of AI models. 2) Due to minimal overlap between the literature reviews' primary sources, we offer holistic insights into and interrelations of frequently addressed topics. These topics encompass the AI development pipeline, respective Software Engineering (SE) practices, and associated challenges. 3) We discuss future research directions for AI's continuous development, integration, and deployment. Therefore, we base our arguments on identified clusters in the primary sources of literature reviews. This discussion focuses on AI model reliability and resource consumption, emphasizing the interrelation of proposed future work and the effects on the whole pipeline.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Existing literature reviews focus on particular facets of MLOps and fail to offer a comprehensive and invariant framework.
“they focus on particular facets of MLOps, thus fail to offer a comprehensive and invariant framework that can weave these perspectives into a unified understanding of MLOps”
From A Multivocal Review of MLOps Practices, Challenges and Open Issues (2026) · cites this paper as Steidl et al. [23]
Steidl et al. conducted a tertiary analysis that identified 33 reviews encompassing 1,397 primary studies on MLOps and found minimal overlap.
“Steidl et al. [23] conducted a tertiary analysis that identified 33 reviews encompassing 1,397 primary studies on MLOps and found minimal overlap in the coverage of these reviews”
From A Multivocal Review of MLOps Practices, Challenges and Open Issues (2026) · cites this paper as Steidl et al. [23]
Cites
Systematic literature reviews in software engineering – A tertiary study
Kitchenham, B., Pretorius, R., Budgen, D., Pearl Brereton, O., Turner, M., Niazi, M., & Linkman, S. (2010) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2010.03.006 · Cited by 1,230 · see citing works
Soldani, J., & Brogi, A. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3501297 · Cited by 256 · see citing works
Lwakatare, L. E., Raj, A., Crnkovic, I., Bosch, J., & Olsson, H. H. (2020) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2020.106368 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Towards MLOps: A Case Study of ML Pipeline Platform
Zhou, Y., Yu, Y., & Ding, B. (2020) · 2020 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Computer Engineering (ICAICE) · doi:10.1109/icaice51518.2020.00102 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
A Systematic Review of Machine Learning DevOps
Mboweni, T., Masombuka, T., & Dongmo, C. (2022) · 2022 International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Energy Technologies (ICECET) · doi:10.1109/icecet55527.2022.9872968 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Multivocal Review of MLOps Practices, Challenges and Open Issues
Eken, B., Pallewatta, S., Tran, N., Tosun, A., & Babar, M. A. (2026) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3747346 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
“Finally, we highlight practitioners’ challenges when adopting MLOps and identify future research directions (Section 5).”
- Authors
- Steidl, M., Ramler, R., & Felderer, M.
- Affiliations
- Universität Innsbruck (AT)
- Software Competence Center Hagenberg (Austria) (AT)
- Venue
- 2024 50th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2024-08-28
- Pages
- 300-308
- OpenAlex
- W4405846439
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 1.14
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA) (publishedVersion)
- elib (German Aerospace Center) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Keywords
- MLOps, AI model deployment, AI model integration, resource consumption, future research directions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review