Cited by 3Software Engineering Techniques and PracticesSoftware Engineering ResearchArtificial Intelligence Applications

The Past, Present, and Future of Research on the Continuous Development of AI

Open access
Steidl, Monika, Ramler, Rudolf, Felderer, Michael·2024·2024 50th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA)

Abstract

Since 2020, 33 literature reviews have systematically synthesized research on the continuous development of AI, also known as Machine Learning Operations (MLOps), reflecting the increasing prevalence of AI models across various fields and the multifaceted challenges in their development, integration, and deployment. Yet, the lack of comprehensive analysis of these literature reviews and their covered topics complicates selecting relevant ones and anticipating future trends and research. In addition, these literature reviews gathered related 1397 primary sources to describe aspects of AI's continuous development, integration, and deployment, posing a hidden gem to gain insights into the past and present work and derive insights into the future of AI's continuous development. With this work, we 1) systematically collected and summarised 33 literature reviews via a Multivocal Literature Review (MLR) that focus on the continuous development, deployment, and integration of AI models. 2) Due to minimal overlap between the literature reviews' primary sources, we offer holistic insights into and interrelations of frequently addressed topics. These topics encompass the AI development pipeline, respective Software Engineering (SE) practices, and associated challenges. 3) We discuss future research directions for AI's continuous development, integration, and deployment. Therefore, we base our arguments on identified clusters in the primary sources of literature reviews. This discussion focuses on AI model reliability and resource consumption, emphasizing the interrelation of proposed future work and the effects on the whole pipeline.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/seaa64295.2024.00054

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing literature reviews focus on particular facets of MLOps and fail to offer a comprehensive and invariant framework.

    “they focus on particular facets of MLOps, thus fail to offer a comprehensive and invariant framework that can weave these perspectives into a unified understanding of MLOps”

    From A Multivocal Review of MLOps Practices, Challenges and Open Issues (2026) · cites this paper as Steidl et al. [23]

  • Steidl et al. conducted a tertiary analysis that identified 33 reviews encompassing 1,397 primary studies on MLOps and found minimal overlap.

    “Steidl et al. [23] conducted a tertiary analysis that identified 33 reviews encompassing 1,397 primary studies on MLOps and found minimal overlap in the coverage of these reviews”

    From A Multivocal Review of MLOps Practices, Challenges and Open Issues (2026) · cites this paper as Steidl et al. [23]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steidl, M., Ramler, R., & Felderer, M.
Affiliations
  • Universität Innsbruck (AT)
  • Software Competence Center Hagenberg (Austria) (AT)
Venue
2024 50th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2024-08-28
Pages
300-308
OpenAlex
W4405846439
Cited by
3
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1
FWCI
1.14
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA) (publishedVersion)
  • elib (German Aerospace Center) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords
MLOps, AI model deployment, AI model integration, resource consumption, future research directions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review