The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A fast automaton-based method for detecting anomalous program behaviors
Abstract
Anomaly detection on system call sequences has become perhaps the most successful approach for detecting novel intrusions. A natural way for learning sequences is to use a finite-state automaton (FSA). However previous research indicates that FSA-learning is computationally expensive, that it cannot be completely automated or that the space usage of the FSA may be excessive. We present a new approach that overcomes these difficulties. Our approach builds a compact FSA in a fully automatic and efficient manner, without requiring access to source code for programs. The space requirements for the FSA is low - of the order of a few kilobytes for typical programs. The FSA uses only a constant time per system call during the learning as well as the detection period. This factor leads to low overheads for intrusion detection. Unlike many of the previous techniques, our FSA-technique can capture both short term and long term temporal relationships among system calls, and thus perform more accurate detection. This enables our approach to generalize and predict future behaviors from past behaviors. As a result, the training periods needed for our FSA based approach are shorter. Moreover false positives are reduced without increasing the likelihood of missing attacks. This paper describes our FSA based technique and presents a comprehensive experimental evaluation of the technique.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition
Rabiner, L. R. (1989) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.18626 · Cited by 22,743
Cited by
Chandola, V., Banerjee, A., & Kumar, V. (2009) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/1541880.1541882 · Cited by 11,687
HOLMES: Real-Time APT Detection through Correlation of Suspicious Information Flows
Milajerdi, S. M., Gjomemo, R., Eshete, B., Sekar, R., & Venkatakrishnan, V. N. (2019) · 2019 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) · doi:10.1109/sp.2019.00026 · Cited by 573
Self-citationUNICORN: Runtime Provenance-Based Detector for Advanced Persistent Threats
Han, X., Pasquier, T., Bates, A., Mickens, J., & Seltzer, M. (2020) · Proceedings 2020 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium · doi:10.14722/ndss.2020.24046 · Cited by 349
NoDoze: Combatting Threat Alert Fatigue with Automated Provenance Triage
Hassan, W. U., Guo, S., Li, D., Chen, Z., Jee, K., Li, Z., & Bates, A. (2019) · Proceedings 2019 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium · doi:10.14722/ndss.2019.23349 · Cited by 341
NODLINK: An Online System for Fine-Grained APT Attack Detection and Investigation
Li, S., Dong, F., Xiao, X., Wang, H., Shao, F., Chen, J., Guo, Y., Chen, X., & Li, D. (2024) · Proceedings 2024 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium · doi:10.14722/ndss.2024.23204 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Sekar, R., Bendre, M., Dhurjati, D., & Bollineni, P.
- Venue
- Proceedings 2001 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. S&P 2001
- Publisher
- IEEE Comput. Soc
- Published
- 2002-11-13
- Pages
- 144-155
- OpenAlex
- W2106649514
- Cited by
- 554
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.50
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A fast automaton-based method for detecting anomalous program behaviors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/secpri.2001.924295
- The paper
- Sekar, R., Bendre, M., Dhurjati, D., & Bollineni, P. (2002). A fast automaton-based method for detecting anomalous program behaviors. Proceedings 2001 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. S&P 2001. https://doi.org/10.1109/secpri.2001.924295
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.