The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Protecting Location Privacy Through Path Confusion
Abstract
We present a path perturbation algorithm which can maximize users’ location privacy given a quality of service constraint. This work concentrates on a class of applications that continuously collect location samples from a large group of users, where just removing user identifiers from all samples is insufficient because an adversary could use trajectory information to track paths and follow users’ footsteps home. The key idea underlying the perturbation algorithm is to cross paths in areas where at least two users meet. This increases the chances that an adversary would confuse the paths of different users. We first formulate this privacy problem as a constrained optimization problem and then develop heuristics for an efficient privacy algorithm. Using simulations with randomized movement models we verify that the algorithm improves privacy while minimizing the perturbation of location samples.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
k-ANONYMITY: A MODEL FOR PROTECTING PRIVACY
SWEENEY, L. (2002) · International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1142/s0218488502001648 · Cited by 8,571
An algorithm for tracking multiple targets
Reid, D. (1979) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1979.1102177 · Cited by 3,059
Cited by
Shokri, R., Theodorakopoulos, G., Le Boudec, J.-Y., & Hubaux, J.-P. (2011) · 2011 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy · doi:10.1109/sp.2011.18 · Cited by 699
Privacy in mobile technology for personal healthcare
Avancha, S., Baxi, A., & Kotz, D. (2012) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2379776.2379779 · Cited by 229
Personalization and privacy: a survey of privacy risks and remedies in personalization-based systems
Toch, E., Wang, Y., & Cranor, L. F. (2012) · User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction · doi:10.1007/s11257-011-9110-z · Cited by 226
Location privacy models in mobile applications: Conceptual view and research directions
Damiani, M. L. (2014) · GeoInformatica · doi:10.1007/s10707-014-0205-7 · Cited by 34
Prediction and Privacy Scheme for Traffic Flow Estimation on the Highway Road Network
Akallouch, M., Akallouch, O., Fardousse, K., Bouhoute, A., & Berrada, I. (2022) · Information · doi:10.3390/info13080381 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoh, B., & Gruteser, M.
- Venue
- First International Conference on Security and Privacy for Emerging Areas in Communications Networks (SECURECOMM'05)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2006-03-22
- Pages
- 194-205
- OpenAlex
- W2125613938
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 18.25
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Protecting Location Privacy Through Path Confusion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/securecomm.2005.33
- The paper
- Hoh, B., & Gruteser, M. (2006). Protecting Location Privacy Through Path Confusion. First International Conference on Security and Privacy for Emerging Areas in Communications Networks (SECURECOMM'05). https://doi.org/10.1109/securecomm.2005.33
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.