Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 387

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How to recycle random bits

Impagliazzo, R., Zuckerman, D.·1989·30th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science

Abstract

It is shown that modified versions of the linear congruential generator and the shift register generator are provably good for amplifying the correctness of a probabilistic algorithm. More precisely, if r random bits are needed for a BPP algorithm to be correct with probability at least 2/3, then O(r+k/sup 2/) bits are needed to improve this probability to 1-2/sup -k/. A different pseudorandom generator that is optimal, up to a constant factor, in this regard is also presented. It uses only O(r+k) bits to improve the probability to 1-2/sup -k/. This generator is based on random walks on expanders. The results do not depend on any unproven assumptions. It is shown that the modified versions of the shift register and linear congruential generators can be used to sample from distributions using, in the limit, the information-theoretic lower bound on random bits.>

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/sfcs.1989.63486

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 387

Metadata

Authors
Impagliazzo, R., & Zuckerman, D.
Venue
30th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
Publisher
IEEE
Published
1989
Pages
248-253
ISSN
0272-5428 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2110824700
Cited by
387
References
1
FWCI
7.14
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How to recycle random bits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/sfcs.1989.63486
The paper
Impagliazzo, R., & Zuckerman, D. (1989). How to recycle random bits. 30th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1109/sfcs.1989.63486

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.