The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Optimal planning of PEVs Charging Stations and Demand Response programs considering distribution and traffic networks
Abstract
One of the challenges of big cities is Green House Gases (GHG) emissions due to driving cars with Internal Conventional Engines (ICE), which are dependent on fossil fuels. Plug-In Electric Vehicles (PEVs) have been developing to cope with the challenges. Flexible fuels, convenience, safe charging, high performance and cost saving are also considered as significant benefits of the technologies. In spite of aforementioned advantages, inappropriate place and size of aggregated PEVs increase loss and voltage degradation. Therefore, optimal planning of Charging Stations (CSs), which consider loss and voltage, is presented in this paper. Time-based programs of Demand Response (DR) are also employed for improving loss and voltage. Time-Of-Use (TOU), Critical Peak Pricing (CPP) and Real Time Pricing (RTP) are applied on the problem. Candidate place of CSs is optimally found by traffic network along with distribution network. Genetic Algorithm (GA) is used to solve the problem. Simulation carries out a 33 bus radial distribution network. Results reveal optimal size of CSs as well as DR programs effect to minimize loss and voltage drop in distribution network. Results demonstrate CSs with more capacity farther power supply may increase loss and voltage degradation. Thus, close candidate places are sized by CSs with more capacity. Results also approve integration of CSs to grid may cause %33 loss and %0.3-%2.3 voltage degradation, which DR with different programs (CPP, TOU and RTP) can…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Power loss cost with DR (Pazouki | 2013 | GA | Y | N | Y | N | N | N | N | L3 | N |”
From Optimal location of electric vehicle charging station and its impact on distribution network: A review (2022) · cites this paper as Pazouki et al., 2013
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- 10.1109/TPWRS.2002.1007912 · DOI
- mohsenzadeh, 0, Simultananeus placement of conventional and renewable distributed generation using multi objective optimization, Proc 2012 IEEE Integration of Renewables into Distributed Grid Workshop
- 10.1109/61.25627 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.10.041 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/PES.2006.1709350 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.05.041 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.epsr.2009.10.007 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPWRD.2010.2047874 · DOI
- zhipeng, 2013, Optimal planning of electricvehicle charging stations in distribution systems, IEEE Trans on Power Delivery, 28, 102, 10.1109/TPWRD.2012.2223489 · DOI
- 10.1109/PES.2008.4596392 · DOI
- 2006, Assessment of Demand Response and Advanced Metering
- zi-fa, 0, Optimal planning of charging station for electric vehicle based on particle swarm optimization, Proc 2011 IEEE Innovative Smart Grid Technologies-Asia (ISGT Asia), 1
- 10.1109/TPWRS.2010.2049133 · DOI · Paper page
- guibin, 2013, Traffic-Constrained Multiobjective Planning of Electric-Vehicle Charging Stations
- 10.1109/TSG.2011.2159816 · DOI
- xu, 2005, Analysis of the energy computation and influence factors of electric vehicle range, J of Vehicle Engineering, 2, 53
- wei-dong, 0, Modeling and simulation of public e v charging station with power storage system, Proc 2011 IEEE Electric Information and Control Engineering (ICEICE) International Conference on, 2346
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ahmad, F., Iqbal, A., Ashraf, I., Marzband, M., & khan, I. (2022) · Energy Reports · doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2022.01.180 · Cited by 533
Islam, M. M., Shareef, H., & Mohamed, A. (2018) · IET Intelligent Transport Systems · doi:10.1049/iet-its.2018.5136 · Cited by 117
Metadata
- Authors
- Pazouki, S., Mohsenzadeh, A., & Haghifam, M.-R.
- Affiliations
- Islamic Azad University, Tehran (IR)
- Tarbiat Modares University (IR)
- Venue
- 2013 Smart Grid Conference (SGC)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2013-12
- Pages
- 90-95
- OpenAlex
- W2045537704
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 2.03
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Smart Grid Conference (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optimal Power Flow Distribution
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Smart Grid Energy Management
- Keywords
- plug-in electric vehicles, charging station siting and sizing, demand response, distribution losses, voltage drop, traffic networks, time-of-use pricing, critical peak pricing, real-time pricing, genetic algorithm, greenhouse gas emissions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review