Cited by 5Digital Mental Health InterventionsUsability and User Interface DesignInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

User experience design to enhance the effectiveness of mobile technologies for the treatment of mental health

Stevens, Ryley, Polk, Kristin, Merrill, Colette, Feng, Fan, Weiss, Maxwell, Brosnan, Elise, Gerber, Matthew S., Barnes, Laura E.·2018·2018 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)

Abstract

In America, half of the population experiences mental health issues in their lifetime. Less than one third, however, will receive treatment. The National Institute of Mental Health calls for research on new, scalable methods for treating mental illness. Cognitive Bias Modification (CBM) is used to alter responses to situations that make participants feel anxious or upset. In this paper, we analyze data from an online, session-based, CBM training program for anxiety in order to make recommendations to improve the user experience increasing engagement and adherence to the program. Our objectives include maximizing user value, decreasing attrition, and minimizing user burden. To meet our objectives, we are analyzing data related to attrition and user engagement and implementing principles of user experience design such as improved visuals and typography and elements of gamification. Preliminary analyses indicate that the highest number of dropouts were less educated participants leaving the program and the highest rates of attrition were shown towards the beginning of the sessions. Additionally, a redesigned interface will be deployed and future data will be collected to determine its effect on attrition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/sieds.2018.8374724

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Education was associated with user engagement: participants with higher education reported more acceptance of interventions than people with lower education (a high school diploma or lower).

    “(2) education, with participants with higher education reporting more acceptance of interventions than people with lower education (a high school diploma or lower) [74-76];”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 10 · Cited by 5

Authors
Stevens, R., Polk, K., Merrill, C., Feng, F., Weiss, M., Brosnan, E., Gerber, M. S., & Barnes, L. E.
Affiliations
University of Virginia (US)
Venue
2018 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-04
Volume
44
Pages
135-140
OpenAlex
W2806243016
Cited by
5
References
10
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2
FWCI
2.32
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
user experience design, cognitive bias modification, anxiety treatment, mobile mental health intervention, attrition, user engagement, gamification, interface redesign, typography, educational attainment, digital mental health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review