The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Multi-Class Classification for IoT Attack Detection: An LLM-Based Approach
Abstract
With the widespread adoption of IoT devices, cyberattacks targeting IoT networks have increased, making the detection of security threats a significant research topic. Traditional ML-based approaches exist for mitigating these threats; however, they suffer from certain limitations, such as limited generalization ability and practical applicability. In this study, a LLM-based approach is proposed for intrusion detection in IoT networks. The open-source CIC IoT 2023 dataset was utilized for attack detection in IoT networks. The detection process was conducted using the DistilBERT model. Initially, the contribution of all features in the dataset to the model’s classification performance was examined. Subsequently, the most important 30 features were selected using the RFE method, and the model’s performance was analyzed. Before feature selection, the fine-tuned DistilBERT model achieved an accuracy of 81%, whereas, after feature selection and further fine-tuning, the model’s accuracy improved to 94%. The obtained results demonstrate that feature selection significantly enhances model performance.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“LLM-augmented GPT-2 pipelines integrate signature-based detection with semantic reasoning to identify previously unseen attack variants”
From Agentic AI and Large Language Models for Autonomous IoT Cybersecurity: A Systematic Survey, Taxonomy, and Research Roadmap (2026) · cites this paper as [74]
In the citing paper
“Hybrid LLM-IDS architectures combine line-rate ML classification with LLM-driven contextual reasoning, achieving improved accuracy and substantially reduced false positives [68,74,113].”
From Agentic AI and Large Language Models for Autonomous IoT Cybersecurity: A Systematic Survey, Taxonomy, and Research Roadmap (2026) · cites this paper as [74]
In the citing paper
“Hybrid IDS architectures that combine line-rate ML detectors with gateway-resident LLMs for triage are gaining traction because they balance latency (tens of milliseconds) with reasoning capacity [16,68,74,87].”
From Agentic AI and Large Language Models for Autonomous IoT Cybersecurity: A Systematic Survey, Taxonomy, and Research Roadmap (2026) · cites this paper as [74]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nageshwaran, V., & Ezekiel, S. (2026) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics15122740 · Cited by 4
“…(single-agent, CoT, detection, cloud); Cur-riculumPT [36] = (multi-agent, plan-and-solve, vulnerability discovery, cloud); the SEED edge IDS [73] = (single-agent, none, detection, edge); and the hybrid LLM-IDS designs of [16,74,87] = (hybrid architecture, ReAct, detection-then-response, fog+cloud).”
InfluentialYAPAY ZEKA DESTEKLİ IOT GÜVENLİK İZLEME SİSTEMİ
Kayaalp, K., Yilmaz, T., & Karabıyık, M. (2025) · Mühendislik Bilimleri ve Tasarım Dergisi · doi:10.21923/jesd.1717599
Traffic-to-Image-Based IoT Intrusion Detection: Multi-Dataset Performance and Efficiency Analysis
Toprak, A. G., Mercan, Ö. B., & Osmanca, M. S. (2026) · Scientific journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University. · doi:10.70030/sjmakeu.2033131
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Mercan, Ö. B., Toprak, A. G., & Osmanca, M. S.
- Affiliations
- Türk Telekom (Turkey) (TR)
- Venue
- 2025 33rd Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2025-06-25
- Pages
- 1-4
- OpenAlex
- W4413464773
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 3.74
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
- Keywords
- IoT attack detection, intrusion detection, multi-class classification, large language models, DistilBERT, feature selection, recursive feature elimination, IoT network security
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multi-Class Classification for IoT Attack Detection: An LLM-Based Approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/siu66497.2025.11112284
- The paper
- Mercan, Ö. B., Toprak, A. G., & Osmanca, M. S. (2025). Multi-Class Classification for IoT Attack Detection: An LLM-Based Approach. 2025 33rd Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU). https://doi.org/10.1109/siu66497.2025.11112284