The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Matching 3D models with shape distributions
Abstract
Measuring the similarity between 3D shapes is a fundamental problem, with applications in computer vision, molecular biology, computer graphics, and a variety of other fields. A challenging aspect of this problem is to find a suitable shape signature that can be constructed and compared quickly, while still discriminating between similar and dissimilar shapes. In this paper, we propose and analyze a method for computing shape signatures for arbitrary (possibly degenerate) 3D polygonal models. The key idea is to represent the signature of an object as a shape distribution sampled from a shape function measuring the global geometric properties of an object. The primary motivation for this approach is to reduce the shape matching problem to the comparison of probability distributions, which is simpler than traditional shape matching methods that require pose registration, feature correspondence or model fitting. We find that the dissimilarities between sampled distributions of simple shape functions (e.g. the distance between two random points on a surface) provide a robust method for discriminating between classes of objects (e.g. cars versus airplanes) in a moderately sized database, despite the presence of arbitrary translations, rotations, scales, reflections, tessellations, simplifications and model degeneracies. They can be evaluated quickly, and thus the proposed method could be applied as a pre-classifier in an object recognition system or in an interactive content-based retrieval application.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rotation invariant spherical harmonic representation of 3D shape descriptors
Kazhdan, M. M., Funkhouser, T. A., & Rusinkiewicz, S. M. (2003) · doi:10.5555/882370.882392 · Cited by 1,202
Self-citationFunkhouser, T., Min, P., Kazhdan, M., Chen, J., Halderman, A., Dobkin, D., & Jacobs, D. (2003) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/588272.588279 · Cited by 935
Self-citationSkeleton based shape matching and retrieval
Sundar, H., Silver, D., Gagvani, N., & Dickinson, S. (2003) · 2003 Shape Modeling International. · doi:10.1109/smi.2003.1199609 · Cited by 560
Shape matching: similarity measures and algorithms
Veltkamp, R. C. (2002) · Proceedings International Conference on Shape Modeling and Applications · doi:10.1109/sma.2001.923389 · Cited by 434
Ensemble of shape functions for 3D object classification
Wohlkinger, W., & Vincze, M. (2011) · 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics · doi:10.1109/robio.2011.6181760 · Cited by 351
Metadata
- Authors
- Osada, R., Funkhouser, T., Chazelle, B., & Dobkin, D.
- Venue
- Proceedings International Conference on Shape Modeling and Applications
- Publisher
- IEEE Computer Society
- Published
- 2002-11-13
- Pages
- 154-166
- OpenAlex
- W2134601920
- Cited by
- 591
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 73.51
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Matching 3D models with shape distributions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/sma.2001.923386
- The paper
- Osada, R., Funkhouser, T., Chazelle, B., & Dobkin, D. (2002). Matching 3D models with shape distributions. Proceedings International Conference on Shape Modeling and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1109/sma.2001.923386
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.