Cited by 70Power System Optimization and StabilityMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrequency Control in Power Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Review on Artificial Intelligence for Grid Stability Assessment

Open access
You, Shutang, Zhao, Yinfeng, Mandich, Mirka, Cui, Yi, Li, Hongyu, Xiao, Huangqing, Fabus, Summer, Su, Yu, Liu, Yilu, Yuan, Haoyu, Jiang, Huaiguang, Tan, Jin, Zhang, Yingchen·2020·2020 IEEE International Conference on Communications, Control, and Computing Technologies for Smart Grids (SmartGridComm)

Abstract

Artificial intelligence provides a convenient route for power grid stability assessment. Compared with simulation-based approaches, artificial intelligence can potentially save time on model development and numerical computation in stability assessment. This paper first reviewed existing literature on using artificial intelligence for power grid stability assessment. Then a machine-leaning-based tool is presented and developed to assess power grid transient stability, frequency stability, and small signals stability. Test results verified the accuracy and effectiveness of the AI tool for power grid stability assessment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/smartgridcomm47815.2020.9302990

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. xiao, 2019, Data-Driven Security Assessment of Power Grids Based on Machine Learning Approach, International Council on Large Electric Systems (CIGRE) Proceedings of the United States National Committee for Grid of the Future Symposium, 1
  2. 10.1109/TPWRS.2004.826018 · DOI
  3. 10.1109/TPWRS.2014.2353048 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 70

Metadata

Authors
You, S., Zhao, Y., Mandich, M., Cui, Y., Li, H., Xiao, H., Fabus, S., Su, Y., Liu, Y., Yuan, H., Jiang, H., Tan, J., & Zhang, Y.
Affiliations
  • University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US)
  • National Laboratory of the Rockies (US)
Venue
2020 IEEE International Conference on Communications, Control, and Computing Technologies for Smart Grids (SmartGridComm)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-11-11
Pages
1-6
OpenAlex
W3116572356
Cited by
70
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 10
FWCI
14.76
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE International Conference on Communications, Control, and Computing Technologies for Smart Grids (SmartGridComm) (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • Office of Energy
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Power System Optimization and Stability
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Microgrid Control and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Frequency Control in Power Systems
Keywords
artificial intelligence, machine learning, transient stability, frequency stability, small-signal stability, power system simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review