ChatGPT: Fundamentals, Applications and Social Impacts
Abstract
Recent progress in large language models has pushed the boundaries of natural language processing, setting new standards for performance. It is remarkable how artificial intelligence can mimic human behavior and writing style in such a convincing way. As a result, it is hard to tell if a human or a machine wrote something. Deep learning and natural language processing have recently advanced large language models. These newer models can learn from large amounts of data to better capture the nuances of language, making them more accurate and robust than ever before. Additionally, these models can now be applied to tasks such as summarizing text, translating between languages, and even generating original content. ChatGPT is a natural language processing (NLP) model developed in 2022 by OpenAI for open-ended conversations. It is based on GPT-3.5, the third-generation language processing model from OpenAI. ChatGPT can power conversational AI applications like virtual assistants and chatbots. In this paper, we describe the current version of ChatGPT and discuss the model's potential and possible social impact. Disclaimer: This paper was not written by ChatGPT: it was written by the listed authors.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ChatGPT enhances students' productivity by boosting their creative performance.
“The findings support our first hypothesis and show that ChatGPT enhances students’ productivity by boosting their creative performance, a finding that aligns with its known capabilities in text processing (Abdullah et al., 2022; Haleem et al., 2022).”
From If ChatGPT can do it, where is my creativity? generative AI boosts performance but diminishes experience in creative writing (2025) · cites this paper as Abdullah et al., 2022
Cites
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 48,293 · see citing works
Transformers: State-of-the-Art Natural Language Processing
Wolf, T., Debut, L., Sanh, V., Chaumond, J., Delangue, C., Moi, A., Cistac, P., Rault, T., Louf, R., Funtowicz, M., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-demos.6 · Cited by 8,741 · see citing works
Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback
Ouyang, L., Wu, J., Jiang, X., Almeida, D., Wainwright, C. L., Mishkin, P., Zhang, C., Agarwal, S., Slama, K., Ray, A., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.02155 · Cited by 4,208 · see citing works
ChatGPT: The End of Online Exam Integrity?
Susnjak, T. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2212.09292 · Cited by 370 · cited 1× · see citing works
“A recent study [25] revealed that ChatGPT has the potential to display sophisticated reasoning and create realistic text with only a small amount of data, which could compromise”
BackgroundHaque, M. U., Dharmadasa, I., Sworna, Z. T., Rajapakse, R. N., & Ahmad, H. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2212.05856 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ray, P. P. (2023) · Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems · doi:10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003 · Cited by 2,463 · see citing works
Yu, H. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1181712 · Cited by 409 · see citing works
“The introduction of Chat GPT will bring more intelligent and efficient solutions to the field of human-computer interaction, providing new opportunities and challenges for the future development of natural language processing technology (Abdullah et al., 2022).”
BackgroundHadi Mogavi, R., Deng, C., Juho Kim, J., Zhou, P., D. Kwon, Y., Hosny Saleh Metwally, A., Tlili, A., Bassanelli, S., Bucchiarone, A., Gujar, S., et al. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100027 · Cited by 369 · see citing works
Yu, H., & Guo, Y. (2023) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2023.1183162 · Cited by 357 · see citing works
A comprehensive survey of ChatGPT: Advancements, applications, prospects, and challenges
Nazir, A., & Wang, Z. (2023) · Meta-Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.metrad.2023.100022 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
Social bot detection in the age of ChatGPT: Challenges and opportunities
Ferrara, E. (2023) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v28i6.13185 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
ChatGPT in finance: Applications, challenges, and solutions
Khan, M. S., & Umer, H. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24890 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Mei, P., Brewis, D. N., Nwaiwu, F., Sumanathilaka, D., Alva-Manchego, F., & Demaree-Cotton, J. (2025) · Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100140 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
“The findings support our first hypothesis and show that ChatGPT enhances students ’ productivity by boosting their creative performance, a finding that aligns with its known capabilities in text processing (Abdullah et al., 2022; Haleem et al., 2022).”
ChatGPT in Colorectal Surgery: A Promising Tool or a Passing Fad?
Li, W., Zhang, Y., & Chen, F. (2023) · Annals of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10439-023-03232-y · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Kim, D., Majdara, A., & Olson, W. (2024) · International Journal of Technology in Education · doi:10.46328/ijte.691 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Banerjee, P., Srivastava, A. K., Adjeroh, D. A., Reddy, R., & Karimian, N. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3524102 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Incorporating AI tools into medical education: harnessing the benefits of ChatGPT and Dall-E
Miftahul Amri, M., & Khairatun Hisan, U. (2023) · Journal of Novel Engineering Science and Technology · doi:10.56741/jnest.v2i02.315 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
AI chatbots: A disguised enemy for academic integrity?
Niloy, A. C., Hafiz, R., Hossain, B. M., Gulmeher, F., Sultana, N., Islam, K. F., Bushra, F., Islam, S., Hoque, S. I., Rahman, M., et al. (2024) · International Journal of Educational Research Open · doi:10.1016/j.ijedro.2024.100396 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Public attitudes toward chatgpt on twitter: sentiments, topics, and occupations
Koonchanok, R., Pan, Y., & Jang, H. (2024) · Social Network Analysis and Mining · doi:10.1007/s13278-024-01260-7 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Li, X., Li, T., Wang, M., Tao, S., Zhou, X., Wei, X., & Guan, N. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2025.3539104 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Public Attitudes Toward ChatGPT on Twitter: Sentiments, Topics, and Occupations
Koonchanok, R., Pan, Y., & Jang, H. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.12951 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Register alignment of ChatGPT-generated academic texts
Demir, N. Y., & Egbert, J. (2026) · Applied Corpus Linguistics · doi:10.1016/j.acorp.2025.100174 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Mirza, K. B., & Arif, M. (2026) · Education for Information · doi:10.1177/01678329261460361
- Authors
- Abdullah, M., Madain, A., & Jararweh, Y.
- Affiliations
- Jordan University of Science and Technology (JO)
- Venue
- 2022 Ninth International Conference on Social Networks Analysis, Management and Security (SNAMS)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2022-11-29
- Pages
- 1-8
- OpenAlex
- W4327500636
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 137 · 2023: 86
- FWCI
- 40.23
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Conference on Social Networks Analysis, Management and Security (SNAMS) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
- Keywords
- ChatGPT, large language models, GPT-3.5, conversational AI, chatbots, virtual assistants, text summarization, machine translation, content creation, societal impact of AI, deep learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review