The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Detecting Offensive Language in Social Media to Protect Adolescent Online Safety
Abstract
Since the textual contents on online social media are highly unstructured, informal, and often misspelled, existing research on message-level offensive language detection cannot accurately detect offensive content. Meanwhile, user-level offensiveness detection seems a more feasible approach but it is an under researched area. To bridge this gap, we propose the Lexical Syntactic Feature (LSF) architecture to detect offensive content and identify potential offensive users in social media. We distinguish the contribution of pejoratives/profanities and obscenities in determining offensive content, and introduce hand-authoring syntactic rules in identifying name-calling harassments. In particular, we incorporate a user's writing style, structure and specific cyber bullying content as features to predict the user's potentiality to send out offensive content. Results from experiments showed that our LSF framework performed significantly better than existing methods in offensive content detection. It achieves precision of 98.24% and recall of 94.34% in sentence offensive detection, as well as precision of 77.9% and recall of 77.8% in user offensive detection. Meanwhile, the processing speed of LSF is approximately 10msec per sentence, suggesting the potential for effective deployment in social media.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Impact of Social Media on Children, Adolescents, and Families
O'Keeffe, G. S., Clarke-Pearson, K., & Council on Communications and Media (2011) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2011-0054 · Cited by 1,987
Zheng, R., Li, J., Chen, H., & Huang, Z. (2006) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20316 · Cited by 519 · cited 1×
“Based on the above observations, three types of features are developed to identify the level of offensiveness, which leveraged from authorship analysis research on cybercrime investigation [20-25]: style features, structural features, and content-specific features.”
Background
Cited by
Abusive Language Detection in Online User Content
Nobata, C., Tetreault, J., Thomas, A., Mehdad, Y., & Chang, Y. (2016) · Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/2872427.2883062 · Cited by 1,122
Us and them: identifying cyber hate on Twitter across multiple protected characteristics
Burnap, P., & Williams, M. L. (2016) · EPJ Data Science · doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0072-6 · Cited by 396
Tweetment Effects on the Tweeted: Experimentally Reducing Racist Harassment
Munger, K. (2017) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-016-9373-5 · Cited by 395
Mohammad, S. M. (2016) · Emotion Measurement · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-100508-8.00009-6 · Cited by 391
Mean Birds: Detecting Aggression and Bullying on Twitter
Chatzakou, D., Kourtellis, N., Blackburn, J., De Cristofaro, E., Stringhini, G., & Vakali, A. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Web Science Conference · doi:10.1145/3091478.3091487 · Cited by 369
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, Y., Zhou, Y., Zhu, S., & Xu, H.
- Venue
- 2012 International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2012 International Confernece on Social Computing
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2012-09
- Pages
- 71-80
- OpenAlex
- W2160685721
- Cited by
- 637
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.91
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detecting Offensive Language in Social Media to Protect Adolescent Online Safety. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/socialcom-passat.2012.55
- The paper
- Chen, Y., Zhou, Y., Zhu, S., & Xu, H. (2012). Detecting Offensive Language in Social Media to Protect Adolescent Online Safety. 2012 International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2012 International Confernece on Social Computing. https://doi.org/10.1109/socialcom-passat.2012.55
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.