Explainable AI In Education : Current Trends, Challenges, And Opportunities
Abstract
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) has garnered significant attention in recent years to increase the transparency of AI models and systems and aid in decision-making. This is particularly important in the education sector, where AI systems are being increasingly used in LMS (Learning Management Systems) and EDM (Educational Data Mining) tools to support the learning and assessment of students. In this paper, based on the existing research and literature on XAI we assert that while XAI in education shares some characteristics with the wider application of explainability approaches in other domains, it also has its own distinctive stipulations that differ from other domains. We aim to address these disparate characteristics by overviewing the XAI approaches in literature from their inception to the current state-of-the-art. We then address various back-drops to appropriately adjust these methods to facilitate favorable explanations for students and finally we identify research gaps in various parameters and suggest potential future research avenues by tethering the identified gaps with advancements in the field.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
XAI can provide valuable insights to educators in learning analytics, highlighting areas where students may require additional support and targeted intervention.
“XAI can provide valuable insights to educators in learning analytics, highlighting areas where students may require additional support and targeted intervention as well as reshaping the lack of knowledge-sharing system [125,128].”
From Recent Emerging Techniques in Explainable Artificial Intelligence to Enhance the Interpretable and Understanding of AI Models for Human (2025) · cites this paper as [125]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 61 · Cited by 68
- Authors
- Rachha, A., & Seyam, M.
- Affiliations
- Virginia Tech (US)
- Venue
- SoutheastCon 2023
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2023-04-01
- Pages
- 232-239
- ISSN
- 1091-0050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4375853956
- Cited by
- 68
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 12.04
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE SoutheastCon (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
- Keywords
- explainable AI, education, virtual learning environments, educational data mining, AI transparency, student assessment, research gaps
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review