The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Study of Probabilistic Password Models
Abstract
A probabilistic password model assigns a probability value to each string. Such models are useful for research into understanding what makes users choose more (or less) secure passwords, and for constructing password strength meters and password cracking utilities. Guess number graphs generated from password models are a widely used method in password research. In this paper, we show that probability-threshold graphs have important advantages over guess-number graphs. They are much faster to compute, and at the same time provide information beyond what is feasible in guess-number graphs. We also observe that research in password modeling can benefit from the extensive literature in statistical language modeling. We conduct a systematic evaluation of a large number of probabilistic password models, including Markov models using different normalization and smoothing methods, and found that, among other things, Markov models, when done correctly, perform significantly better than the Probabilistic Context-Free Grammar model proposed in Weir et al., which has been used as the state-of-the-art password model in recent research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Two birds with one stone: two-factor authentication with security beyond conventional bound
Wang, D., & Wang, P. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing · doi:10.1109/tdsc.2016.2605087 · Cited by 539
Wang, D., Cheng, H., Wang, P., Huang, X., & Jian, G. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2017.2721359 · Cited by 499
Targeted Online Password Guessing: An Underestimated Threat
Wang, D., Zhang, Z., Wang, P., Yan, J., & Huang, X. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/2976749.2978339 · Cited by 323
Who Are You? A Statistical Approach to Measuring User Authenticity
Freeman, D., Jain, S., Duermuth, M., Biggio, B., & Giacinto, G. (2016) · Proceedings 2016 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium · doi:10.14722/ndss.2016.23240 · Cited by 123
Malik, M. N., Azam, M. A., Ehatisham-Ul-Haq, M., Ejaz, W., & Khalid, A. (2019) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s19112466 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Ma, J., Yang, W., Luo, M., & Li, N.
- Venue
- 2014 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2014-05
- Pages
- 689-704
- ISSN
- 1081-6011 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2007488200
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.52
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Study of Probabilistic Password Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/sp.2014.50
- The paper
- Ma, J., Yang, W., Luo, M., & Li, N. (2014). A Study of Probabilistic Password Models. 2014 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. https://doi.org/10.1109/sp.2014.50
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.