Comparison of Different Classification Methods for Breast Cancer Subtypes Prediction
Abstract
Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers among women. Due to heterogeneity of cancers, breast cancer is divided into different subtypes. Different subtypes have different molecular genesis, so the corresponding target cells and treatment plans are different. Identifying the correct cancer subtypes is important for cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Breast cancer subtypes can be divided into four types: Basal, Her2, Luminal A, and Luminal B. Many machine learning approaches have been applied to cancer subtypes classification in the past few years, we present a comparison of different classifiers K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Multi-Layer Perception (MLP), and Multi-Grained Cascade Forest (gcForest) on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) databases of breast cancer. As we all know, biological data are high-dimensional and have small sample size, so before classification, we use subtype dependent feature selection method to reduce dimensionality of RNA-Seq gene expression data. Experimental results show that gcForest has a higher accuracy rate for breast cancer subtypes prediction compared with other classifiers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Xu et al.'s gcForest classifier achieved a higher accuracy score of 92% for predicting four subtypes of breast cancer compared with KNN, SVM, and MLP.
“The results showed that gcForest showed a higher accuracy score of 92%.”
From A Comprehensive Review on Synergy of Multi-Modal Data and AI Technologies in Medical Diagnosis (2024) · cites this paper as [112]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 5
- Authors
- Xu, J., Wu, P., Chen, Y., & Zhang, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Jinan (CN)
- Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University (CN)
- Venue
- 2018 International Conference on Security, Pattern Analysis, and Cybernetics (SPAC)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2018-12
- Pages
- 91-96
- OpenAlex
- W3002051394
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Conference on Security, Pattern Analysis, and Cybernetics (SPAC) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
- Keywords
- breast cancer subtypes, molecular subtyping, classifier comparison, k-nearest neighbors, support vector machine, multilayer perceptron, gene expression data, RNA-seq, feature selection, high-dimensional small-sample data, TCGA breast cancer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review