Cited by 19Gaze Tracking and Assistive TechnologyEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesTeleoperation and Haptic Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Using machine learning based on eye gaze to predict targets: An exploratory study

Castellanos, Javier L., Gomez, Maria F., Adams, Kim D.·2017·2017 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI)

Abstract

Play is a crucial activity for child development. Play in children with physical disabilities may be compromised due to their physical limitations, such as having difficulties reaching and manipulating objects. Assistive technology robotic systems have been used as tools for children with disabilities to play and interact with the environment. Robots have shown a positive impact on children's independence, cognitive, and social skills. The present study is the first stage of a project to develop a telerobotic haptic system, with the goal of supporting the reaching of toys during play by children with severe physical disabilities. The end goal is to provide haptic guidance towards the toys that the children want to play with. The objective of this paper was to investigate the feasibility of predicting the selection of targets in a three-block task. This prediction was based on the Point of Gaze (POG) data of five participants while performing the task using a telerobotic haptic system. Two fixation-based algorithms, longest fixation and last fixation, and two learning algorithms, a Double Q-learning and a Multi-Layer Perceptron neural network, were implemented, tested, and compared. Results showed that the learning algorithms were better at predicting the targets than the fixation-based algorithms, with above 92% accuracy. This demonstrated that the learning algorithms can be utilized for activating haptic guidance towards the targets (toys).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/ssci.2017.8285207

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. haykin, 2008, Introduction, Neural Networks and Learning Machines, 3, 1
  2. van hasselt, 2010, Double Q-leaming, Advances in neural information processing systems
  3. gibaldi, 2016, Evaluation of the Tobii EyeX Eye tracking controller and Matlab toolkit for research, Behav Res Methods
  4. 10.1007/s00221-008-1549-8 · DOI
  5. 10.1007/978-3-319-07437-5_30 · DOI
  6. marti, 2011, Learning through play with a robot companion, Everyday Technology for Independence and Care, 29, 526
  7. poletz, 2010, Robot skills and cognitive performance of preschool children, Technol Disabil, 22, 117, 10.3233/TAD-2010-0296 · DOI
  8. 10.3109/17483107.2012.697532 · DOI
  9. 10.1108/02602280410515770 · DOI
  10. jafari, 2016, Haptics to improve task performance in people with disabilities A review of previous studies and a guide to future research with children with disabilities, 3, 1
  11. 10.1111/cgf.12603 · DOI
  12. sibert, 2000, Evaluation of eye gaze interaction, Proc CHI SIGCHI Conf Human Factors Comput Syst, 281
  13. 10.4316/AECE.2016.04015 · DOI
  14. 10.1145/2578153.2578156 · DOI
  15. 10.1109/TNSRE.2002.806829 · DOI
  16. 10.1145/3020165.3022131 · DOI
  17. 10.5014/ajot.45.10.882 · DOI
  18. 10.1115/1.4030608 · DOI
  19. garvey, 1990, Play
  20. 10.1017/S0012162206001162 · DOI
  21. 10.1167/12.1.3 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/B978-032302954-4.10005-4 · DOI
  23. 10.1075/is.13.2.03rob · DOI
  24. 10.5014/ajot.54.1.73 · DOI
  25. ferland, 2003, Le jeu et 1' enfant, Le modèle ludique, 15, 10.4000/books.pum.13819 · DOI
  26. cook, 2010, Robots: Assistive technologies for play, learning and cognitive development, Technol Disabil, 22, 127, 10.3233/TAD-2010-0297 · DOI
  27. tanta, 2014, Play, Occupational Therapy for Children and Adolescents, 483
  28. 10.1682/JRRD.2014.10.0228 · DOI
  29. van den heuvel, 2015, Robots and ICT to support play in children with severe physical disabilities: a systematic review, Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol, 1
  30. ben taher, 2016, An extended eye movement tracker system for an electric wheelchair movement control, Proceedings of IEEE/ACS International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications AICCSA
  31. 10.3109/17483107.2016.1167970 · DOI
  32. 10.1080/17483107.2017.1318308 · DOI
  33. 10.1109/TSMCC.2012.2226444 · DOI
  34. 10.1007/978-1-4471-6392-3_3 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Castellanos, J. L., Gomez, M. F., & Adams, K. D.
Affiliations
University of Alberta (CA)
Venue
2017 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2017-11
Pages
1-7
OpenAlex
W2787013146
Cited by
19
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3
FWCI
1.65
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
Keywords
gaze, target prediction, children with physical disabilities, haptic guidance, assistive robotics, play, point of gaze, double Q-learning, multilayer perceptron, assistive technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review