The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A review on cybersecurity vulnerabilities for unmanned aerial vehicles
Abstract
This paper surveys the scientific and trade literature on cybersecurity for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), concentrating on actual and simulated attacks, and the implications for small UAVs. The review is motivated by the increasing use of small UAVs for inspecting critical infrastructures such as the electric utility transmission and distribution grid, which could be a target for terrorism. The paper presents a modified taxonomy to organize cyber attacks on UAVs and exploiting threats by Attack Vector and Target. It shows that, by Attack Vector, there has been one physical attack and ten remote attacks. By Target, there have been six attacks on GPS (two jamming, four spoofing), two attacks on the control communications stream (a deauthentication attack and a zero-day vulnerabilities attack), and two attacks on data communications stream (two intercepting the data feed, zero executing a video replay attack). The paper also divides and discusses the findings by large or small UAVs, over or under 25 kg, but concentrates on small UAVs. The survey concludes that UAV-related research to counter cybersecurity threats focuses on GPS Jamming and Spoofing, but ignores attacks on the controls and data communications stream. The gap in research on attacks on the data communications stream is concerning, as an operator can see a UAV flying off course due to a control stream attack but has no way of detecting a video replay attack (substitution of a video feed).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
UAV Communications for 5G and Beyond: Recent Advances and Future Trends
Li, B., Fei, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2019) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2018.2887086 · Cited by 1,377
Towards the Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs): A Comprehensive Review
Mohsan, S. A. H., Khan, M. A., Noor, F., Ullah, I., & Alsharif, M. H. (2022) · Drones · doi:10.3390/drones6060147 · Cited by 916
Blockchain envisioned uav networks: challenges, solutions, and comparisons
Mehta, P., Gupta, R., & Tanwar, S. (2020) · Computer Communications · doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2020.01.023 · Cited by 266
Cognition in UAV-Aided 5G and Beyond Communications: A Survey
Ullah, Z., Al-Turjman, F., & Mostarda, L. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking · doi:10.1109/tccn.2020.2968311 · Cited by 226
Metadata
- Authors
- Krishna, C. G. L., & Murphy, R. R.
- Venue
- 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Safety, Security and Rescue Robotics (SSRR)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2017-10
- Pages
- 194-199
- OpenAlex
- W2766764374
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 33.16
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review on cybersecurity vulnerabilities for unmanned aerial vehicles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/ssrr.2017.8088163
- The paper
- Krishna, C. G. L., & Murphy, R. R. (2017). A review on cybersecurity vulnerabilities for unmanned aerial vehicles. 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Safety, Security and Rescue Robotics (SSRR). https://doi.org/10.1109/ssrr.2017.8088163
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.