Cited by 11Computability, Logic, AI AlgorithmsAlgorithms and Data CompressionDiverse Interdisciplinary Research Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

On the improbability of algorithmic specified complexity

Ewert, W., Marks, Robert J., Dembski, W. A.·2013·45th Southeastern Symposium on System Theory

Abstract

An event with low probability is unlikely to happen, but events with low probability happen all of the time. This is because many distinct low probability events can have a large combined probability. However, some low probability events can be seen to follow an independent pattern. Algorithmic specified complexity (ASC) measures the degree to which an event is improbable and follows a pattern. We show a bound on the probability of obtaining a particular value of algorithmic specified complexity. Consequently we can say that high ASC objects are improbable.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/ssst.2013.6524962

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Algorithmic Specified Complexity (ASC) incorporates both Shannon and Kolmogorov complexity measures and quantifies the degree to which an event is improbable and follows a pattern.

    “ACS incorporates both Shannon and Kolmogorov complexity measures, and it quantifies the degree to which an event is improbable and follows a pattern.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. cover, 2006, Elements of Information Theory
  2. chaitin, 1999, The Unknowable
  3. 10.1080/00207166808803030 · DOI
  4. 10.1109/TIT.1968.1054210 · DOI
  5. ewert, 2012, Algorithmic Specified Complexity, Engineering and Metaphysics
  6. 10.1017/CBO9780511570643 · DOI · Paper page
  7. solomonoff, 1960, A preliminary report on a general theory of inductive inference

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ewert, W., Marks, R. J., & Dembski, W. A.
Affiliations
  • Baylor University (US)
  • Discovery Institute (US)
Venue
45th Southeastern Symposium on System Theory
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2013-03
Pages
68-70
ISSN
0094-2898 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2117491534
Cited by
11
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.52
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Southeastern Symposium on System Theory (SSST) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Theoretical Computer Science › Algorithms and Data Compression
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Diverse Interdisciplinary Research Studies
Keywords
improbability, probability bounds, low-probability events, pattern detection, algorithmic information theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review