A New Converter for Common Mode Noise Reduction for EPS of a Nano satellite
Abstract
The paper proposes a new architecture of power electronic converter for interfacing the battery with PV panels for an Electric Power Supply (EPS) of a Nano Satellite with minimal leakage currents preventing unforeseen situations due to ground bouncing. This paper addresses the need for a generalized design approach to obtain a highly efficient EPS of a nanosatellite with design example. The provided results validate the claims and demonstrate the capability under different source and load conditions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A new converter for common-mode noise reduction interfaces the PV panels to the power bus of the satellite with minimum leakage currents avoiding unpredicted ground bouncing conditions.
“A new converter for common-mode noise reduction is introduced in [61] as illustrated in Fig. 6. The common-mode noise reduction architecture interfaces the PV panels to the power bus of the satellite with minimum leakage currents avoiding unpredicted ground bouncing conditions.”
From A Comprehensive Review on Small Satellite Microgrids (2022) · cites this paper as [61]
In this converter, two inductors are cumulatively coupled at the output stage for reduction of phase current ripple while increasing the efficiency by reducing the component count of the EPS.
“In this converter, two inductors are cumulatively coupled at the output stage for reduction of phase current ripple while increasing the efficiency by reducing the component count of the EPS.”
From A Comprehensive Review on Small Satellite Microgrids (2022) · cites this paper as [61]
The proposed converter connects two buck-derived converters differentially ensuring zero common mode current in the ground, which makes the converter safe at slight ground bouncing, improves the converter electromagnetic compatibility (EMC), and negates the parasitic effects at normal operation.
“The proposed converter connects two buck-derived converters differentially ensuring zero common mode current in the ground which makes the converter safe at slight ground bouncing, improves the converter electromagnetic compatibility (EMC), and negates the parasitic effects at normal operation.”
From A Comprehensive Review on Small Satellite Microgrids (2022) · cites this paper as [61]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Comprehensive Review on Small Satellite Microgrids
Yaqoob, M., Lashab, A., Vasquez, J. C., Guerrero, J. M., Orchard, M. E., & Bintoudi, A. D. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · doi:10.1109/tpel.2022.3175093 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
- Authors
- Faujdar, J., Gautam, D. K., & Verma, V.
- Affiliations
- Delhi Technological University (IN)
- ORCID
- Verma, Vishal
- Venue
- 2020 IEEE First International Conference on Smart Technologies for Power, Energy and Control (STPEC)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2020-09-25
- Pages
- 1-6
- OpenAlex
- W3115948026
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 1.05
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE International Conference on Smart Technologies for Power, Energy and Control (STPEC) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced DC-DC Converters
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electromagnetic Compatibility and Noise Suppression
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Multilevel Inverters and Converters
- Keywords
- common-mode noise reduction, power converters, photovoltaic interfacing, leakage current, ground bounce
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
