The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trust Computations and Trust Dynamics in Mobile Adhoc Networks: A Survey
Abstract
Trust is an important aspect of mobile adhoc networks (MANETs). It enables entities to cope with uncertainty and uncontrollability caused by the free will of others. Trust computations and management are highly challenging issues in MANETs due to computational complexity constraints, and the independent movement of component nodes. This prevents the direct application of techniques suited for other networks. In MANETs, an untrustworthy node can wreak considerable damage and adversely affect the quality and reliability of data. Therefore, analyzing the trust level of a node has a positive influence on the confidence with which an entity conducts transactions with that node. In this work we present a detailed survey on various trust computing approaches that are geared towards MANETs. We highlight the summary and comparisons of these approaches. In addition, we analyze various works on trust dynamics including trust propagation, prediction and aggregation algorithms, the influence of network dynamics on trust dynamics and the impact of trust on security services.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Affect and Cognition Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations
McAllister, D. J. (1995) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256727 · Cited by 7,346
Douceur, J. R. (2002) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45748-8_24 · Cited by 4,419
Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. (1985) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2578601 · Cited by 4,163
Resnick, P., Kuwabara, K., Zeckhauser, R., & Friedman, E. (2000) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/355112.355122 · Cited by 2,190
The social control of impersonal trust
Shapiro, S. P. (1987) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/228791 · Cited by 1,725
A survey of trust in internet applications
Grandison, T., & Sloman, M. (2000) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2000.5340804 · Cited by 1,157
Cited by
An Efficient Distributed Trust Model for Wireless Sensor Networks
Jiang, J., Han, G., Wang, F., Shu, L., & Guizani, M. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems · doi:10.1109/tpds.2014.2320505 · Cited by 287
Metadata
- Authors
- Govindan, K., & Mohapatra, P.
- Venue
- IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 279-298
- ISSN
- 1553-877X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2040128811
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 36.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trust Computations and Trust Dynamics in Mobile Adhoc Networks: A Survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/surv.2011.042711.00083
- The paper
- Govindan, K., & Mohapatra, P. (2012). Trust Computations and Trust Dynamics in Mobile Adhoc Networks: A Survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials. https://doi.org/10.1109/surv.2011.042711.00083
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
