Cited by 5Technology Use by Older AdultsVirtual Reality Applications and ImpactsUsability and User Interface Design

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

User Interface Evaluation Methods for Elderly: A Systematic Review

Postal, Manoela Rogofski Brum, Rieder, Rafael·2019·2019 21st Symposium on Virtual and Augmented Reality (SVR)

Abstract

Virtual reality (VR) solutions are increasing and establishing in society, considering the current use of nonconventional interaction devices in entertainment applications, serious games, and social networks. In this context, the elderly public already knows or is familiar with this type of technology, from rehabilitation processes that stimulate the practice of physical and cognitive activities. VR systems' usability needs to be evaluated to ensure user safety, user satisfaction, and health intervention efficiency for the olders. Evaluation processes also must consider the analysis of specific aspects of each interface, such as immersion and presence for 3D user interfaces. With this in mind, this study presents a systematic review of the literature to identify methods or approaches that have been used to evaluate VR applications for elderly. As a result, 28 papers were selected considering eligibility criteria. We did not find an accepted methodology to evaluate interfaces projected for elderly, once there was not a consensus in tools used from results. Our results highlight the lack of a specific evaluation methodology for the elderly, especially focused on 3D user interfaces. Evaluation tools for this audience may be relevant to suit validate an VR application, considering sensory feedback aspects and relationships between the interaction process and effects of aging.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/svr.2019.00029

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 5

Metadata

Authors
Postal, M. R. B., & Rieder, R.
Affiliations
Universidade de Passo Fundo (BR)
Venue
2019 21st Symposium on Virtual and Augmented Reality (SVR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-10
Pages
84-91
OpenAlex
W2994255186
Cited by
5
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.70
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Symposium on Virtual and Augmented Reality (SVR) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
Keywords
virtual reality, elderly users, usability evaluation, 3D user interfaces, immersion and presence, evaluation methodology, aging, rehabilitation, serious games, sensory feedback

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review