The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimal adaptive estimation of sampled stochastic processes
Abstract
This work presents an adaptive approach to the problem of estimating a sampled, stochastic process described by an initially unknown parameter vector. Knowledge of this quantity completely specifies the statistics of the process, and consequently the optimal estimator must "learn" the value of the parameter vector. In order that construction of the optimal estimator be feasible it is necessary to consider only those processes whose parameter vector comes from a finite set of a priori known values. Fortunately, many practical problems may be represented or adequately approximated by such a model. The optimal estimator is found to be composed of a set of elemental estimators and a corresponding set of weighting coefficients, one pair for each possible value of the parameter vector. This structure is derived using properties of the conditional mean operator. For Gauss-Markov processes the elemental estimators are linear, dynamic systems, and evaluation of the weighting coefficients involves relatively simple, nonlinear calculations. The resulting system is optimum in the sense that it minimizes the expected value of a positive-definite, quadratic form in terms of the error (a generalized mean-square-error criterion). Because the system described in this work is optimal, it differs from previous attempts at adaptive estimation, all of which have used approximation techniques or sub-optimal, sequential, optimization procedures [12], [13], and [14].
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems
Kalman, R. E. (1960) · Journal of Basic Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.3662552 · Cited by 31,751
An Introduction to the Theory of Random Signals and Noise
Davenport, W. B., & Root, W. L. (1987) · Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers eBooks · doi:10.1109/9780470544143 · Cited by 1,452
Applied Statistical Decision Theory.
Roy, A. D., Raiffa, H., & Schaifer, R. (1962) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2228630 · Cited by 632
An Approach to Time Series Analysis
Parzen, E. (1961) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177704840 · Cited by 379
Cited by
A Survey of Fault Detection, Isolation, and Reconfiguration Methods
Hwang, I., Kim, S., Kim, Y., & Seah, C. E. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology · doi:10.1109/tcst.2009.2026285 · Cited by 1,305
Survey of maneuvering target tracking. part v: multiple-model methods
Li, X. R., & Jilkov, V. P. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems · doi:10.1109/taes.2005.1561886 · Cited by 1,157
A Review on Kalman Filter Models
Khodarahmi, M., & Maihami, V. (2023) · Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11831-022-09815-7 · Cited by 561
Modeling, Clustering, and Segmenting Video with Mixtures of Dynamic Textures
Chan, A. B., & Vasconcelos, N. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2007.70738 · Cited by 459
Partitioning: A unifying framework for adaptive systems, I: Estimation
Lainiotis, D. G. (1976) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/proc.1976.10284 · Cited by 338
Metadata
- Authors
- Magill, D.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
- Published
- 1965-10
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 434-439
- ISSN
- 0018-9286 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2074232022
- Cited by
- 786
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 3.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimal adaptive estimation of sampled stochastic processes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tac.1965.1098191
- The paper
- Magill, D. (1965). Optimal adaptive estimation of sampled stochastic processes. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. https://doi.org/10.1109/tac.1965.1098191
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.