The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Invertibility of linear time-invariant dynamical systems
Abstract
The question of inverting linear time-invariant dynamical systems has been of interest to control engineers for many years. An example of the nonstate-variable approach and application of this concept is the very well known work of Bode and Shannon in 1950. With the integration of state-variable descriptions and techniques into systems problems, the question has recently reappeared in a somewhat more complicated guise. Basically, the problem of inverting such dynamical systems is to determine the existence of the inverse, its properties, and its construction in terms of the matrices which characterize its state description. The first general study of existence appears to be due indirectly to Brockett and Mesarovic in 1965, and the first general construction seems to have been proposed by Youla and Dorato in 1966. Neither of these works was intended to develop a substantial insight into the properties of the inverse. The present work introduces the concept of the inherent integration associated with a dynamical system, i.e., the number of integrations which no inverse dynamical system can remove unless ideal differentiators are introduced. The existence of the inverse is discussed in terms of a determination of the inherent integration, and the construction which realizes this minimum number of integrations is given. The existence tests introduced are at worst one-half as complex as that of Brockett and Mesarovic and the construction offers a substantial improvement in conceptual simplicity over that of Youla and Dorato. The results are made possible by recognizing an essential equivalence with an associated problem in real sequential circuits and appear to be applicable to related problems in sensitivity, estimation, and game theory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Levin, A. U., & Narendra, K. S. (1996) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/72.478390 · Cited by 441
Strong detectability and observers
Hautus, M. L. J. (1983) · Linear Algebra and its Applications · doi:10.1016/0024-3795(83)90061-7 · Cited by 375
Attack detection and identification for automatic generation control systems
Ameli, A., Hooshyar, A., El-Saadany, E. F., & Youssef, A. M. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2018.2810161 · Cited by 222
Observability of modally reduced order models with unknown parameters
Maes, K., Chatzis, M. N., Vandebril, R., & Lombaert, G. (2021) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106993 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Sain, M., & Massey, J.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
- Published
- 1969-04
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 141-149
- ISSN
- 0018-9286 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2087932696
- Cited by
- 511
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Invertibility of linear time-invariant dynamical systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tac.1969.1099133
- The paper
- Sain, M., & Massey, J. (1969). Invertibility of linear time-invariant dynamical systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. https://doi.org/10.1109/tac.1969.1099133
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.