Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 376

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The optimum linear smoother as a combination of two optimum linear filters

Fraser, D., Potter, J.·1969·IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control

Abstract

A solution to the optimum linear smoothing problem is presented in which the smoother is interpreted as a combination of two optimum linear filters. This result is obtained from the well-known equation for the maximum likelihood combination of two independent estimates and equivalence to previous formulations is demonstrated. Forms of the solution which are convenient for practical computation are developed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tac.1969.1099196

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 376

Metadata

Authors
Fraser, D., & Potter, J.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
Published
1969-08
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
387-390
ISSN
0018-9286 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2161129698
Cited by
376
References
1
FWCI
2.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The optimum linear smoother as a combination of two optimum linear filters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tac.1969.1099196
The paper
Fraser, D., & Potter, J. (1969). The optimum linear smoother as a combination of two optimum linear filters. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. https://doi.org/10.1109/tac.1969.1099196

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.