The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Principal component analysis in linear systems: Controllability, observability, and model reduction
Abstract
Kalman's minimal realization theory involves geometric objects (controllable, unobservable subspaces) which are subject to structural instability. Specifically, arbitrarily small perturbations in a model may cause a change in the dimensions of the associated subspaces. This situation is manifested in computational difficulties which arise in attempts to apply textbook algorithms for computing a minimal realization. Structural instability associated with geometric theories is not unique to control; it arises in the theory of linear equations as well. In this setting, the computational problems have been studied for decades and excellent tools have been developed for coping with the situation. One of the main goals of this paper is to call attention to principal component analysis (Hotelling, 1933), and an algorithm (Golub and Reinsch, 1970) for computing the singular value decompositon of a matrix. Together they form a powerful tool for coping with structural instability in dynamic systems. As developed in this paper, principal component analysis is a technique for analyzing signals. (Singular value decomposition provides the computational machinery.) For this reason, Kalman's minimal realization theory is recast in terms of responses to injected signals. Application of the signal analysis to controllability and observability leads to a coordinate system in which the "internally balanced" model has special properties. For asymptotically stable systems, this yields working approximations ofX_{c}, X_{\bar{o}}, the controllable and unobservable subspaces. It is proposed that a natural first step in model reduction is to apply the mechanics of minimal realization using these working subspaces.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Solving Least Squares Problems
Lawson, C. L., & Hanson, R. J. (1995) · doi:10.1137/1.9781611971217 · Cited by 7,103
Singular value decomposition and least squares solutions
Golub, G. H., & Reinsch, C. (1970) · Numerische Mathematik · doi:10.1007/bf02163027 · Cited by 2,929
Cited by
An eigensystem realization algorithm for modal parameter identification and model reduction
Juang, J.-N., & Pappa, R. S. (1985) · Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics · doi:10.2514/3.20031 · Cited by 2,762
Digital twin: values, challenges and enablers from a modeling perspective
Rasheed, A., San, O., & Kvamsdal, T. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2970143 · Cited by 1,952
Feature dimensionality reduction: a review
Jia, W., Sun, M., Lian, J., & Hou, S. (2022) · Complex & Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1007/s40747-021-00637-x · Cited by 797
Perspectives on system identification
Ljung, L. (2010) · Annual Reviews in Control · doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2009.12.001 · Cited by 707
Closed-Loop Turbulence Control: Progress and Challenges
Brunton, S. L., & Noack, B. R. (2015) · Applied Mechanics Reviews · doi:10.1115/1.4031175 · Cited by 623
Metadata
- Authors
- Moore, B.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
- Published
- 1981-02
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-32
- ISSN
- 0018-9286 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2064733273
- Cited by
- 5,282
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 72.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Principal component analysis in linear systems: Controllability, observability, and model reduction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tac.1981.1102568
- The paper
- Moore, B. (1981). Principal component analysis in linear systems: Controllability, observability, and model reduction. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. https://doi.org/10.1109/tac.1981.1102568
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.