The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Alternative Distributed Algorithms for Network Utility Maximization: Framework and Applications
Abstract
Network utility maximization (NUM) problem formulations provide an important approach to conduct network resource allocation and to view layering as optimization decomposition. In the existing literature, distributed implementations are typically achieved by means of the so-called dual decomposition technique. However, the span of decomposition possibilities includes many other elements that, thus far, have not been fully exploited, such as the use of the primal decomposition technique, the versatile introduction of auxiliary variables, and the potential of multilevel decompositions. This paper presents a systematic framework to exploit alternative decomposition structures as a way to obtain different distributed algorithms, each with a different tradeoff among convergence speed, message passing amount and asymmetry, and distributed computation architecture. Several specific applications are considered to illustrate the proposed framework, including resource-constrained and direct-control rate allocation, and rate allocation among QoS classes with multipath routing. For each of these applications, the associated generalized NUM formulation is first presented, followed by the development of novel alternative decompositions and numerical experiments on the resulting new distributed algorithms. A systematic enumeration and comparison of alternative vertical decompositions in the future will help complete a mathematical theory of network architectures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Boyd, S., & Vandenberghe, L. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804441 · Cited by 56,601
A tutorial on decomposition methods for network utility maximization
Palomar, D. P., & Chiang, M. (2006) · IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · doi:10.1109/jsac.2006.879350 · Cited by 1,647
Self-citation
Cited by
MIMO Transceiver Design via Majorization Theory
Palomar, D. P., & Jiang, Y. (2007) · Foundations and Trends in Communications and Information Theory · doi:10.1561/0100000018 · Cited by 320
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Palomar, D. P., & Chiang, M.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
- Published
- 2007-12
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2254-2269
- ISSN
- 0018-9286 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2038888321
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 36.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Alternative Distributed Algorithms for Network Utility Maximization: Framework and Applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tac.2007.910665
- The paper
- Palomar, D. P., & Chiang, M. (2007). Alternative Distributed Algorithms for Network Utility Maximization: Framework and Applications. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. https://doi.org/10.1109/tac.2007.910665
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.