A Small-Gain Approach to Robust Event-Triggered Control of Nonlinear Systems
Abstract
This paper presents a new approach to event-triggered control for nonlinear uncertain systems by using the notion of input-to-state stability (ISS) and the nonlinear small-gain theorem. The contribution of this paper is threefold. First, it is proved that infinitely fast sampling can be avoided if the system is input-to-state stabilizable with the sampling error as the external input and the corresponding ISS gain is locally Lipschitz. No assumption on the existence of known ISS-Lyapunov functions is made in the discussions. Moreover, the forward completeness problem with event-triggered control is studied systematically by using ISS small-gain arguments. Second, the proposed approach gives rise to a new self-triggered sampling strategy for a class of nonlinear systems subject to external disturbances. If an upper bound of the external disturbance is known, then the closed-loop system can be designed to be robust to the external disturbance, and moreover, the system state globally asymptotically converges to the origin if the external disturbance decays to zero. Third, a new design method is developed for event-triggered control of nonlinear uncertain systems in the strict-feedback form. It is particularly shown that the ISS gain with the sampling error as the input can be designed to satisfy the proposed condition for event-triggered control and self-triggered control.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Event-triggered strategies have recently been applied in ADP-based control algorithms to save limited communication and computational resources.
“In order to save limited communication and computational resources, event-triggered strategies have recently started to be applied in control algorithms based on ADP [31-34].”
From Data-driven control of hydraulic servo actuator: An event-triggered adaptive dynamic programming approach (2023) · cites this paper as [34]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 42 · Cited by 398
- Authors
- Liu, T., & Jiang, Z.-P.
- Affiliations
- State Key Laboratory of Synthetical Automation for Process Industries (CN)
- New York University (US)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
- Published
- 2015-08
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2072-2085
- ISSN
- 0018-9286 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2523
- OpenAlex
- W2045511098
- Cited by
- 398
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 4
- FWCI
- 27.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- NSF (DMS-0906659, ECCS-1230040)
- NSFC (61374042)
- Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (N130108001, N140805001)
- State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Control and Decision of Complex Systems
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Stability and Control of Uncertain Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Advanced Control Systems Design
- Keywords
- event-triggered control, small gain theorem, input-to-state stability, uncertain nonlinear systems, forward completeness, robustness to external disturbances, strict-feedback form, sampling error
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review