Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 361

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Neural data mining for credit card fraud detection

Brause, R., Langsdorf, T., Hepp, M.·2003·Proceedings 11th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

The prevention of credit card fraud is an important application for prediction techniques. One major obstacle for using neural network training techniques is the high necessary diagnostic quality: since only one financial transaction in a thousand is invalid no prediction success less than 99.9% is acceptable. Because of these credit card transaction requirements, completely new concepts had to be developed and tested on real credit card data. This paper shows how advanced data mining techniques and a neural network algorithm can be combined successfully to obtain a high fraud coverage combined with a low false alarm rate.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tai.1999.809773

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 361

Metadata

Authors
Brause, R., Langsdorf, T., & Hepp, M.
Venue
Proceedings 11th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence
Published
2003-01-20
Pages
103-106
OpenAlex
W2105809068
Cited by
361
References
0
FWCI
4.91
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neural data mining for credit card fraud detection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tai.1999.809773
The paper
Brause, R., Langsdorf, T., & Hepp, M. (2003). Neural data mining for credit card fraud detection. Proceedings 11th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1109/tai.1999.809773

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.