Cited by 7Artificial Intelligence in EducationIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningEducational Technology in Learning

Leveraging Artificial Intelligence with Zone of Proximal Development: An ARCS Motivational E-Learning Model

Isaac, Matilda, Ateeq, Mohammad, Hafizh, Hadyan, Hu, Bintao, Shodipo, Dolapo·2023·2023 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE)

Abstract

The study aims to investigate the complex effects of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education (AIED) on Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD). ZPD a concept introduced by Lev Vygotsky during the late 1920's, stands on the premise that the distance between actual development level (independence) and the level of potential development (dependence) lies in mentorship by adult guidance and peer collaboration. Several social-cultural theories have utilized this to analyze the relationship between instructor and learner achievement. The idea is to influence the learner's knowledge zone by active and productive interaction. It has been noted that when learners are given the opportunity to collaborate it not only motivates the learner but also influences their sociological development and this helps to bolster their already established knowledge. However, the role of AI on the ZPD of the learner creates a dichotomy that needs further exploration. A ubiquitous AI educational setting may encourage learners to remain passive rather than foster participatory behaviour and positive outcome. These inclinations toward passive compliance are evident in the concept of AI systems enabling" personalized learning," which departs from the theory of learning as a social action and civic engagement. We further explore the role of motivation through the ARCS model in minimizing an adverse effect of AI on a learner's ZPD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tale56641.2023.10398344

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Proper use of Chatbots in the classroom offers benefits that outweigh the risks to academic integrity for both students and faculty.

    “Isaac et al. [15] also support a positive stance on the use of Chatbots in the classroom, highlighting that their proper use offers benefits that outweigh the risks to academic integrity for both students and faculty.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 22 · Cited by 7

Authors
Isaac, M., Ateeq, M., Hafizh, H., Hu, B., & Shodipo, D.
Affiliations
  • Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University (CN)
  • Detroit Public Library (US)
Venue
2023 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2023-11-28
Pages
1-8
OpenAlex
W4391266255
Cited by
7
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3
FWCI
1.80
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology in Learning
Keywords
artificial intelligence in education, zone of proximal development, ARCS model, student motivation, online learning, Vygotsky, personalized learning, peer collaboration, social learning theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review