The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparative analysis of edge- and broadside-coupled split ring resonators for metamaterial design - Theory and experiments
Open accessAbstract
This paper develops a quasi-analytical and self-consistent model to compute the polarizabilities of split ring resonators (SRRs). An experimental setup is also proposed for measuring the magnetic polarizability of these structures. Experimental data are provided and compared with theoretical results computed following the proposed model. By using a local field approach, the model is applied to the obtaining of the dispersion characteristics of discrete negative magnetic permeability and left-handed metamaterials. Two types of SRRs, namely, the so-called edge coupled- and broadside coupled- SRRs, have been considered. A comparative analysis of these two structures has been carried out in connection with their suitability for the design of metamaterials. Advantages and disadvantages of both structures are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electromagnetic Mixing Formulas and Applications
Sihvola, A. (1999) · doi:10.1049/pbew047e · Cited by 1,838
Cited by
Baena, J. D., Bonache, J., Martin, F., Sillero, R. M., Falcone, F., Lopetegi, T., Laso, M. A. G., Garcia-Garcia, J., Gil, I., Portillo, M. F., et al. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2005.845211 · Cited by 1,624
Babinet Principle Applied to the Design of Metasurfaces and Metamaterials
Falcone, F., Lopetegi, T., Laso, M. A. G., Baena, J. D., Bonache, J., Beruete, M., Marqués, R., Martín, F., & Sorolla, M. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.197401 · Cited by 962
Manipulating light polarization with ultrathin plasmonic metasurfaces
Zhao, Y., & Alù, A. (2011) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.84.205428 · Cited by 733
Homogenization of metamaterials by field averaging (invited paper)
Smith, D. R., & Pendry, J. B. (2006) · Journal of the Optical Society of America B · doi:10.1364/josab.23.000391 · Cited by 608
A positive future for double-negative metamaterials
Engheta, N., & Ziolkowski, R. W. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2005.845188 · Cited by 448
Metadata
- Authors
- Marques, R., Mesa, F., Martel, J., & Medina, F.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
- Published
- 2003-10
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2572-2581
- ISSN
- 0018-926X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2103384997
- Cited by
- 856
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative analysis of edge- and broadside-coupled split ring resonators for metamaterial design - Theory and experiments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tap.2003.817562
- The paper
- Marques, R., Mesa, F., Martel, J., & Medina, F. (2003). Comparative analysis of edge- and broadside-coupled split ring resonators for metamaterial design - Theory and experiments. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation. https://doi.org/10.1109/tap.2003.817562
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
