Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 65Cryptographic Implementations and SecurityCoding theory and cryptographyCryptography and Residue Arithmetic

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A survey on lightweight ciphers for IoT devices

Philip, Merly Annie, Vaithiyanathan·2017·2017 International Conference on Technological Advancements in Power and Energy ( TAP Energy)
DOI 10.1109/tapenergy.2017.8397271
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Embedded systems are found to be used in a wide range of domains. But the inherent limitations of size, memory and power, limits its functionality in secure transmission of sensitive information. The existing cryptographic systems need some area for implementation, limiting its use in embedded systems. Hence, lightweight ciphers which can be easily implemented in resource constrained devices were introduced. In this paper we discuss such existing lightweight block ciphers, PRESENT, KATAN, Humming bird, SIMON, and RECTANGLE and stream ciphers, TRIVIUM, GRAIN, CHACHA, WG-8 and ESPRESSO.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tapenergy.2017.8397271

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. beaulieu, 2013, The SIMON and SPECK Families of Lightweight Block Ciphers, Cryptol ogy ePrint Archive Report 2013/404
  2. wentao, 2015, RECTANGLE: a bitslice lightweight block cipher suitable for multiple platforms, Science China Information Sciences
  3. charalampos, 2014, Lightweight cryptography for embedded systems-A comparative analysis, Data Privacy Management and Autonomous Spontaneous Security, 333
  4. canniere christophe, 2005, TRIVIUM -a stream cipher construction inspired by block cipher design principles, ESTREAM the ECRYPT Stream Cipher Project Report 2005/066
  5. bernstein, 2008, The Salsa20 family of stream ciphers, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4986, 84, 10.1007/978-3-540-68351-3_8 · DOI
  6. xinxin, 2013, Wg-8: A lightweight stream cipher for resource-constrained smart devices, International Conference on Heterogeneous Networking for Quality Reliability Security and Robustness
  7. elena, 2017, Espresso: A stream cipher for 5G wireless communication systems, Cryptography and Communications, 9 2, 273
  8. frederik, 2015, On lightweight stream ciphers with shorter internal states, Fast Software Encryption Third International Workshop
  9. lennart, 0, Comparison of Lightweight Stream Ciphers MICKEY 2 0 WG-8 Grain and Trivium
  10. masanobu, 2008, Lightweight cryptography for the internet of things, Sony Corporation, 7
  11. gaurav, 2016, An ultra lightweight encryption design for security in pervasive computing, Big Data Security on Cloud (BigDataSecurity) IEEE International Conference on High Performance and Smart Computing (HPSC) and IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Data and Security (IDS) 2016 IEEE 2nd International Conference on IEEE
  12. adrian-vasile, 2017, Implementation of SIMON and SPECK lightweight block ciphers on programmable logic controllers, 2017 5th International Symposium on Digital Forensic and Security (ISDFS), 1
  13. lejla, 2013, Dietary recommendations for lightweight block ciphers: power, energy and area analysis of recently developed architectures, Radio Frequency Identification: Security and Privacy Issues
  14. andrey, 2007, PRESENT: An ultra-lightweight block cipher, CHES, 4727, 450
  15. mickael, 2013, Survey and benchmark of lightweight block ciphers for wireless sensor networks, Security and Cryptography (SECRYPT) 2013 International Conference on
  16. 10.1109/ICITST.2009.5402515 · DOI
  17. wenling, 2011, LBlock: a lightweight block cipher, Applied Cryptography and Network Security
  18. engels, 2011, The Hummingbird-2 Lightweight Authenticated Encryption Algorithm, RFIDSec, 11, 19
  19. akshay, 2016, Recent advances in lightweight stream ciphers, CSI transactions on ICT 4 2–4, 173
  20. sriram, 2016, Lightweight security framework for IoTs using identity based cryptography, Advances in Computing Communications and Informatics (ICACCI) 2016 International Conference on
  21. shumit, 2014, Design and implementation of block cipher in hummingbird algorithm over FPGA, Computing Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT) 2014 International Conference on, 1
  22. ali, 2015, An efficient hardware implementation of few lightweight block cipher, Artificial Intelligence and Signal Processing (AISP) 2015 International Symposium on, 273
  23. george, 2017, A review of lightweight block ciphers, Journal of Cryptographic Engineering, 1
  24. xinxin, 2010, FPGA implementations of the Hummingbird cryptographic algorithm, Hardware-Oriented Security and Trust (HOST) 2010 IEEE International Symposium on, 48
  25. chungath, 2015, Cube Attack on Stream Ciphers using a Modified Linearity Test, Journal of Discrete Mathematical Sciences and Cryptography, 18, 301, 10.1080/09720529.2014.995967 · DOI
  26. puliparambil megha, 2016, Hash-One: a lightweight cryptographic hash function, IET Information Security, 10, 225, 10.1049/iet-ifs.2015.0385 · DOI

Cited by

See all 65

Metadata

Authors
Philip, M. A., & Vaithiyanathan
Affiliations
Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham (IN)
ORCID
Philip, Merly Annie
Venue
2017 International Conference on Technological Advancements in Power and Energy ( TAP Energy)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2017-12
Pages
1-4
DOI
10.1109/tapenergy.2017.8397271
OpenAlex
W2810564382
Cited by
65
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.12
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Technological Advancements in Power and Energy (TAP Energy) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptographic Implementations and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics › Coding theory and cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cryptography and Residue Arithmetic
Keywords
lightweight cryptography, Internet of Things security, resource-constrained devices, block cipher, stream ciphers, present moment, hummingbirds, Simon, rectangles, trivium, grain, ChaCha, espresso, embedded systems security

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A survey on lightweight ciphers for IoT devices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tapenergy.2017.8397271
The paper
Philip, M. A., & Vaithiyanathan. (2017). A survey on lightweight ciphers for IoT devices. 2017 International Conference on Technological Advancements in Power and Energy ( TAP Energy). https://doi.org/10.1109/tapenergy.2017.8397271

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.