RISE-Based Adaptive Control of Hydraulic Systems With Asymptotic Tracking
Abstract
Parametric uncertainty associated with unmodeled disturbance always exist in physical hydraulic systems, and complicate the advanced nonlinear controller design. In this paper, an adaptive compensation with a robust integral of the sign of the error (RISE) feedback is developed for high precise tracking control of hydraulic motion system. To handle both payload and hydraulic unknown parameters in one controller, a chain of integrator nonlinear system model is first derived, and an adaptive RISE controller is then proposed, in which adaptive law is synthesized to handle parametric uncertainty and RISE robust term to attenuate unmodeled disturbance. The major feature of the proposed controller is that it can theoretically guarantee asymptotic tracking performance with a continuous control input, in the presence of various parametric uncertainties and unmodeled disturbances such as unconsidered dynamics as well as external disturbances via Lyapunov analysis. However, the proposed controller takes the acceleration as a system state, which usually suffers heavy noise pollution and thus cannot be utilized directly in actual control. To solve this practical issue, in this paper, a tracking differentiator is employed to extract high-quality acceleration signal and to make the proposed controller feasible execution. The effectiveness of the proposed nonlinear controller is demonstrated via comparative experimental results.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
RISE/ARISE control greatly improves the trajectory tracking accuracy of electro-hydraulic servo systems.
“The above literature shows that RISE/ARISE control greatly improves the trajectory tracking accuracy of EHSS.”
From RISE-based adaptive control of electro-hydraulic servo system with uncertain compensation (2023) · cites this paper as [19]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 200
- Authors
- Yao, J., Deng, W., & Jiao, Z.
- Affiliations
- Nanjing University of Science and Technology (CN)
- Beihang University (CN)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering
- Published
- 2017-07
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1524-1531
- ISSN
- 1545-5955 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-3783
- OpenAlex
- W2343736713
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 11.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (51305203 and Grant 51675279)
- Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20141402)
- China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2014M551593)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Dynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems
- Keywords
- robust integral of the sign of the error, RISE control, adaptive control, hydraulic systems, asymptotic tracking, parameter uncertainty, unmodeled disturbances, tracking differentiator, nonlinear control, Lyapunov stability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review