Cited by 17Stability and Control of Uncertain SystemsAdvanced Control Systems DesignAdvanced Control Systems Optimization

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dwell-Time-Based Robust Stabilization and L ₂–Gain Analysis for Asynchronously Switched Linear Systems With Actuator Saturation

Chen, Qi, Ma, Ruicheng·2024·IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering

Abstract

This paper studies the robust stabilization problem and$L_{2}-$gain analysis for a class of asynchronously switched linear systems with actuator saturation under the dwell time switching signal. The switching signal of the switched controller involves time delay, which results in the asynchronous switching between the candidate controller and the subsystems. The matched state feedback controllers for each subsystem are designed by proposing a new type of multiple time-varying piecewise Lyapunov functions (MTVPLFs), and the computable sufficient conditions for the robust stabilization and$L_{2}-$gain problem of the studied switched systems are proposed respectively within the framework of a dwell-time switching. The convex hull technique is employed to deal with actuator saturation. Finally, an illustrative example of the problem of the continuously stirred tank reactor is presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed method.Note to Practitioners—In asynchronously switched linear systems with actuator saturation, the stability of the systems is very important. Actuator saturation is one of the reasons for degrading system performance, and the switching instants of the controllers may lag behind the corresponding subsystems to generate asynchronous switching. The coexistence of actuator saturation and asynchronous switching exacerbates the instability of the switched systems. In view of actuator saturation and asynchronous switching, the asynchronous state feedback controllers for each subsystem are designed by proposing a new type of MTVPLFs and dwell time switching strategy.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tase.2023.3332785

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 17

Metadata

Authors
Chen, Q., & Ma, R.
Affiliations
  • Dalian University of Technology (CN)
  • Liaoning University (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering
Published
2024-10
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
6882-6891
ISSN
  • 1545-5955 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-3783
OpenAlex
W4388819679
Cited by
17
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4
FWCI
1.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (62073157)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province (2022-MS-173)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Stability and Control of Uncertain Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Advanced Control Systems Design
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Advanced Control Systems Optimization
Keywords
actuator saturation, dwell-time switching, robust stabilization, L2-gain analysis, state feedback controller, continuous stirred tank reactor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review