The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Performance tradeoffs in dynamic time warping algorithms for isolated word recognition
Abstract
The technique of dynamic programming for the time registration of a reference and a test pattern has found widespread use in the area of isolated word recognition. Recently, a number of variations on the basic time warping algorithm have been proposed by Sakoe and Chiba, and Rabiner, Rosenberg, and Levinson. These algorithms all assume that the test input is the time pattern of a feature vector from an isolated word whose endpoints are known (at least approximately). The major differences in the methods are the global path constraints (i.e., the region of possible warping paths), the local continuity constraints on the path, and the distance weighting and normalization used to give the overall minimum distance. The purpose of this investigation is to study the effects of such variations on the performance of different dynamic time warping algorithms for a realistic speech database. The performance measures that were used include: speed of operation, memory requirements, and recognition accuracy. The results show that both axis orientation and relative length of the reference and the test patterns are important factors in recognition accuracy. Our results suggest a new approach to dynamic time warping for isolated words in which both the reference and test patterns are linearly warped to a fixed length, and then a simplified dynamic time warping algorithm is used to handle the nonlinear component of the time alignment. Results with this new algorithm show performance comparable to or better than that of all other dynamic time warping algorithms that were studied.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dynamic Programming Algorithm Optimization for Spoken Word Recognition
Sakoe, H., & Chiba, S. (1978) · IEEE Transactions on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tassp.1978.1163055 · Cited by 6,727
Cited by
Kinect-enabled home-based rehabilitation system using Dynamic Time Warping and fuzzy logic
Su, C.-J., Chiang, C.-Y., & Huang, J.-Y. (2014) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2014.04.020 · Cited by 149
General Evaluation for Instruction Conditioned Navigation using Dynamic Time Warping
Ilharco, G., Jain, V., Ku, A., Ie, E., & Baldridge, J. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.05446
Metadata
- Authors
- Myers, C., Rabiner, L., & Rosenberg, A.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing
- Published
- 1980-12
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 623-635
- ISSN
- 0096-3518 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2139106564
- Cited by
- 568
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Performance tradeoffs in dynamic time warping algorithms for isolated word recognition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tassp.1980.1163491
- The paper
- Myers, C., Rabiner, L., & Rosenberg, A. (1980). Performance tradeoffs in dynamic time warping algorithms for isolated word recognition. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tassp.1980.1163491
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.