Cited by 580Image and Signal Denoising MethodsAdvanced Adaptive Filtering TechniquesDigital Filter Design and Implementation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

A generalization of median filtering using linear combinations of order statistics

Bovik, A., Huang, T., Munson, D.·1983·IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing

Abstract

We consider a class of nonlinear filters whose output is given by a linear combination of the order statistics of the input sequence. Assuming a constant signal in white noise, the coefficients in the linear combination are chosen to minimize the output MSE for several noise distributions. It is shown that the optimal order statistic filter (OSF) tends toward the median filter as the noise becomes more impulsive. The optimal OSF is applied to an actual noisy image and is shown to perform well, combining properties of both the averaging and median filters. A more general design scheme for applications involving nonconstant signals is also given.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tassp.1983.1164247

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 14 · Cited by 580

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. 10.1109/ICASSP.1982.1171857 · DOI
  2. 10.1214/aoms/1177728788 · DOI
  3. 10.1214/aoms/1177728495 · DOI
  4. 10.1214/aoms/1177728418 · DOI
  5. 10.1080/01621459.1970.10481137 · DOI
  6. vaughan, 1972, Permanent expressions for order statistic densities, J Roy Statist Soc, 34, 308, 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00909.x · DOI
  7. pratt, 1978, Digital Image Processing
  8. 10.1109/TCOM.1976.1093415 · DOI
  9. 10.1109/TASSP.1980.1163426 · DOI
  10. 10.1109/TASSP.1979.1163188 · DOI
  11. 10.2307/2332466 · DOI
  12. 10.1109/TCOM.1984.1096099 · DOI
  13. 10.1109/TASSP.1975.1162749 · DOI
  14. tukey, 0, Nonlinear (nonsuperposable) methods for smoothing data, Conf Rec 1974 EASCON, 673
  15. david, 1981, Order Statistics

Metadata

Authors
Bovik, A., Huang, T., & Munson, D.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing
Published
1983-12
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
1342-1350
ISSN
0096-3518 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007148047
Cited by
580
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 16
FWCI
7.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Signal Denoising Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Advanced Adaptive Filtering Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Digital Filter Design and Implementation
Keywords
median filter, order statistic filters, filter optimization, minimum mean square error, impulsive noise, image denoising, averaging filter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review