Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 190

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A modified K-means clustering algorithm for use in isolated work recognition

Wilpon, J., Rabiner, L.·1985·IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing

Abstract

Studies of isolated word recognition systems have shown that a set of carefully chosen templates can be used to bring the performance of speaker-independent systems up to that of systems trained to the individual speaker. The earliest work in this area used a sophisticated set of pattern recognition algorithms in a human-interactive mode to create the set of templates (multiple patterns) for each word in the vocabulary. Not only was this procedure time consuming but it was impossible to reproduce exactly because it was highly dependent on decisions made by the experimenter. Subsequent work led to an automatic clustering procedure which, given only a set of clustering parameters, clustered patterns with the same performance as the previously developed supervised algorithms. The one drawback of the automatic procedure was that the specification of the input parameter set was found to be somewhat dependent on the vocabulary type and size of population to be clustered. Since a naive user of such a statistical clustering algorithm could not be expected, in general, to know how to choose the word clustering parameters, even this automatic clustering algorithm was not appropriate for a completely general word recognition system. It is the purpose of this paper to present a clustering algorithm based on a standard K-means approach which requires no user parameter specification. Experimental data show that this new algorithm performs as well or better than the previously used clustering techniques when tested as part of a speaker-independent isolated word recognition system.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tassp.1985.1164581

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

  • Self-supervised speech representation learning: A review

    Mohamed, A., Lee, H.-Y., Borgholt, L., Havtorn, J. D., Edin, J., Igel, C., Kirchhoff, K., Li, S.-W., Livescu, K., Maaløe, L., et al. (2022) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/jstsp.2022.3207050 · Cited by 372

    “work such as [26], [27], word patterns were clustered semiautomatically using techniques such as k-means, after which isolated words were recognized by finding the training cluster”
    Method

See all 190

Metadata

Authors
Wilpon, J., & Rabiner, L.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing
Published
1985-06
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
587-594
ISSN
0096-3518 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2048648518
Cited by
190
References
1
FWCI
5.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A modified K-means clustering algorithm for use in isolated work recognition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tassp.1985.1164581
The paper
Wilpon, J., & Rabiner, L. (1985). A modified K-means clustering algorithm for use in isolated work recognition. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tassp.1985.1164581

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.