The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On the use of bandpass liftering in speech recognition
Abstract
In a template-based speech recognition system, distortion measures that compute the distance or dissimilarity between two spectral representations have a strong influence on the performance of the recognizer. Accordingly, extensive comparative studies have been conducted to determine good distortion measures for improved recognition accuracy. Previous studies have shown that the log likelihood ratio measure, the likelihood ratio measure, and the truncated cepstral measures all gave good recognition performance (comparable accuracy) for isolated word recognition tasks. In this paper we extend the interpretation of distortion measures, based upon the observation that measurements of speech spectral envelopes (as normally obtained from standard analysis procedures such as LPC or filter banks) are prone to statistical variations due to window position fluctuations, excitation interference, measurement noise, etc., and may not accurately characterize the true speech spectrum because of analysis model constraints. We have found that these undesirable spectral measurement variations can be partially controlled (i.e., reduced in the level of variation) by appropriate signal processing techniques. In particular, we have found that a bandpass "liftering" process reduces the variability of the statistical components of LPC-based spectral measurements and hence it is desirable to use such a liftering process in a speech recognizer. We have applied this liftering process to several speech recognition tasks: in particular, single frame vowel recognition and isolated word recognition. Using the liftering process, we have been able to achieve an average digit error rate of 1 percent in a speaker-independent isolated digit test. This error rate is about one-half that obtained without the liftering process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition
Rabiner, L. R. (1989) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.18626 · Cited by 22,743
Self-citationSignal modeling techniques in speech recognition
Picone, J. W. (1993) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.237532 · Cited by 757
Speech recognition in noisy environments: A survey
Gong, Y. (1995) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/0167-6393(94)00059-j · Cited by 635
Automatic speech recognition and speech variability: A review
Benzeghiba, M., De Mori, R., Deroo, O., Dupont, S., Erbes, T., Jouvet, D., Fissore, L., Laface, P., Mertins, A., Ris, C., et al. (2007) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/j.specom.2007.02.006 · Cited by 529
Lockwood, P., & Boudy, J. (1992) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/0167-6393(92)90016-z · Cited by 347
Metadata
- Authors
- Juang, B.-H., Rabiner, L., & Wilpon, J.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing
- Published
- 1987-07
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 947-954
- ISSN
- 0096-3518 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2112529238
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the use of bandpass liftering in speech recognition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tassp.1987.1165237
- The paper
- Juang, B.-H., Rabiner, L., & Wilpon, J. (1987). On the use of bandpass liftering in speech recognition. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tassp.1987.1165237
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.