The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Canonic realizations of digital filters using the continued fraction expansion
Abstract
Canonic realizations of a digital transfer function using the continued fraction expansion techniques are derived. Realizability conditions of each realization are provided along with illustrative examples.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The type IB ladder form of [16] corresponds to the transfer function of (13) with γ_k = δ_k = 1 for all k.
“the type IB ladder form of [16] corresponds to the transfer function of (13) with γ k = δ k = 1 for all k”
From A Simple Ladder Realization of Maximally Flat Allpass Fractional Delay Filters (2014) · cites this paper as [16]
A ladder structure for the prototype filter G_p(z) can be easily constructed.
“we can easily construct a ladder structure for the prototype filter G p ( z ) [16].”
From A Simple Ladder Realization of Maximally Flat Allpass Fractional Delay Filters (2014) · cites this paper as [16]
The ladder structure for the prototype filter G_p(z) can be obtained by slightly modifying the type IB ladder form of [16].
“The ladder structure for the prototype filter G p ( z ) can be obtained by slightly modifying the type IB ladder form of [16].”
From A Simple Ladder Realization of Maximally Flat Allpass Fractional Delay Filters (2014) · cites this paper as [16]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- wall, 1948, Analytic Theory of Continued Fractions
- avenhaus, 1970, On the approximation problem in the design of digital filters with limited word lengths, Arch Elek Ubertragung, 24, 571
- 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1970.tb01763.x · DOI
- hermann, 1970, On the accuracy problem in the design of nonrecursive dgital filters, Arch Elek Ubertragung, 24, 525
- edwards, 1969, Comparison of noise performances of programming methods in the realization of digital filters, Proc Symp Comput Processing Commun, xix, 295
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Closed-Form Design of Half-Sample Delay IIR Filter Using Continued Fraction Expansion
Tseng, C.-C. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers · doi:10.1109/tcsi.2006.887643 · Cited by 9
A Simple Ladder Realization of Maximally Flat Allpass Fractional Delay Filters
Koshita, S., Abe, M., & Kawamata, M. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs · doi:10.1109/tcsii.2013.2296131 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Mitra, S., & Sherwood, R.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Davis (US)
- ORCID
- Mitra, S.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics
- Published
- 1972-08
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 185-194
- ISSN
- 0018-9278 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1999789757
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 9.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Digital Filter Design and Implementation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Advanced Adaptive Filtering Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
- Keywords
- digital filters, continued fraction expansion, realizability conditions, filter structure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
