Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 596

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparing Reconstruction Algorithms for Electrical Impedance Tomography

Yorkey, Thomas J., Webster, John G., Tompkins, Willis J.·1987·IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

An improved electrical impedance tomographic reconstruction algorithm is presented that is generally guaranteed to converge. The algorithm is attractive for several reasons. A modified Newton-Raphson method varies a finite-element model of resistivities to fit a set of voltage measurements in a least-squared sense. Two procedures for calculating the Jacobian matrix are derived. One is standard, while the other is based on the compensation theorem. This second procedure is more efficient for computations, and just as accurate as the standard one. The inherent ill-conditioning in the approximate Hessian matrix of the linearized system is eliminated using the Marquardt method. Results from two-dimensional computer simulations are compared to four other reconstruction algorithms, which are based on methods proposed by other authors. The modified Newton-Raphson method provided significantly better reconstructions than any of the other methods. The algorithms compared are the perturbation, equipotential, iterative-equipotential, and the double-constraint methods. The modified Newton-Raphson method was found to be sensitive to measurement error, but future work in designing electrode-probing configurations is expected to reduce this sensitivity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tbme.1987.326032

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 596

Metadata

Authors
Yorkey, T. J., Webster, J. G., & Tompkins, W. J.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
Published
1987-11
Volume
BME-34
Issue
11
Pages
843-852
ISSN
  • 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2531
OpenAlex
W2077204104
Cited by
596
References
2
FWCI
8.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.