The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Computational techniques for solving the bidomain equations in three dimensions
Abstract
The bidomain equations are the most complete description of cardiac electrical activity. Their numerical solution is, however, computationally demanding, especially in three dimensions, because of the fine temporal and spatial sampling required. This paper methodically examines computational performance when solving the bidomain equations. Several techniques to speed up this computation are examined in this paper. The first step was to recast the equations into a parabolic part and an elliptic part. The parabolic part was solved by either the finite-element method (FEM) or the interconnected cable model model (ICCM). The elliptic equation was solved by FEM on a coarser grid than the parabolic problem and at a reduced frequency. The performance of iterative and direct linear equation system solvers was analyzed as well as the scalability and parallelizability of each method. Results indicate that the ICCM was twice as fast as the FEM for solving the parabolic problem, but when the total problem was considered, this resulted in only a 20% decrease in computation time. The elliptic problem could be solved on a coarser grid at one-quarter of the frequency at which the parabolic problem was solved and still maintain reasonable accuracy. Direct methods were faster than iterative methods by at least 50% when a good estimate of the extracellular potential was required. Parallelization over four processors was efficient only when the model comprised at least 500,000 nodes. Thus, it was possible to speed up solution of the bidomain equations by an order of magnitude with a slight decrease in accuracy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Validity of the single processor approach to achieving large scale computing capabilities
Amdahl, G. M. (1967) · Proceedings of the April 18-20, 1967, spring joint computer conference on - AFIPS '67 (Spring) · doi:10.1145/1465482.1465560 · Cited by 4,339
Cited by
Potse, M., Dube, B., Richer, J., Vinet, A., & Gulrajani, R. M. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2006.880875 · Cited by 470
Verification of cardiac tissue electrophysiology simulators using an N -version benchmark
Niederer, S. A., Kerfoot, E., Benson, A. P., Bernabeu, M. O., Bernus, O., Bradley, C., Cherry, E. M., Clayton, R., Fenton, F. H., Garny, A., et al. (2011) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2011.0139 · Cited by 275
Strocchi, M., Augustin, C. M., Gsell, M. A. F., Karabelas, E., Neic, A., Gillette, K., Razeghi, O., Prassl, A. J., Vigmond, E. J., Behar, J. M., et al. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0235145 · Cited by 112
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Vigmond, E. J., Aguel, F., & Trayanova, N. A.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
- Published
- 2002-11
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1260-1269
- ISSN
- 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2158417622
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computational techniques for solving the bidomain equations in three dimensions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tbme.2002.804597
- The paper
- Vigmond, E. J., Aguel, F., & Trayanova, N. A. (2002). Computational techniques for solving the bidomain equations in three dimensions. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/tbme.2002.804597
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.