The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Wavelet-Chaos Methodology for Analysis of EEGs and EEG Subbands to Detect Seizure and Epilepsy
Abstract
A wavelet-chaos methodology is presented for analysis of EEGs and delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma subbands of EEGs for detection of seizure and epilepsy. The nonlinear dynamics of the original EEGs are quantified in the form of the correlation dimension (CD, representing system complexity) and the largest Lyapunov exponent (LLE, representing system chaoticity). The new wavelet-based methodology isolates the changes in CD and LLE in specific subbands of the EEG. The methodology is applied to three different groups of EEG signals: 1) healthy subjects; 2) epileptic subjects during a seizure-free interval (interictal EEG); 3) epileptic subjects during a seizure (ictal EEG). The effectiveness of CD and LLE in differentiating between the three groups is investigated based on statistical significance of the differences. It is observed that while there may not be significant differences in the values of the parameters obtained from the original EEG, differences may be identified when the parameters are employed in conjunction with specific EEG subbands. Moreover, it is concluded that for the higher frequency beta and gamma subbands, the CD differentiates between the three groups, whereas for the lower frequency alpha subband, the LLE differentiates between the three groups.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Daubechies, I. (1992) · doi:10.1137/1.9781611970104 · Cited by 15,979
Cited by
Acharya, U. R., Oh, S. L., Hagiwara, Y., Tan, J. H., & Adeli, H. (2018) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.09.017 · Cited by 1,647
Self-citationMixed-Band Wavelet-Chaos-Neural Network Methodology for Epilepsy and Epileptic Seizure Detection
Ghosh-Dastidar, S., Adeli, H., & Dadmehr, N. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2007.891945 · Cited by 470
Self-citationGhosh-Dastidar, S., Adeli, H., & Dadmehr, N. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2007.905490 · Cited by 466
Self-citationComputer-Aided diagnosis of Parkinson’s Disease Using Enhanced Probabilistic Neural Network
Hirschauer, T. J., Adeli, H., & Buford, J. A. (2015) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-015-0353-9 · Cited by 177
Self-citationA novel computer-aided diagnosis framework for EEG-based identification of neural diseases
Sadiq, M. T., Akbari, H., Siuly, S., Yousaf, A., & Rehman, A. U. (2021) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104922 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Adeli, H., Ghosh-Dastidar, S., & Dadmehr, N.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
- Published
- 2007-02
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 205-211
- ISSN
- 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2158468574
- Cited by
- 686
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.