Cited by 98Inertial Sensor and NavigationContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks

Estimation of Upper-Limb Orientation Based on Accelerometer and Gyroscope Measurements

Hyde, Rick A., Ketteringham, Laurence P., Neild, Simon A., Jones, Rosie J. S.·2008·IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

A solution is proposed to the estimation of upper-limb orientation using miniature accelerometers and gyroscopes. This type of measurement device has many different possible applications, ranging from clinical use with patients presenting a number of conditions such as upper motor neuron syndrome and pathologies that give rise to loss of dexterity, to competitive sports training and virtual reality. Here we focus on a design that minimizes the number of sensors whilst delivering estimates of known accuracy over a defined frequency range. Minimizing the sensor count can make the measurement system less obtrusive, as well as minimising cost and reducing the required bandwidth if using a wireless solution. Accurate measurement of movement amplitude up to 15 Hz is required in our immediate application, namely to quantify tremor in multiple sclerosis patients. The drive for low numbers of sensors and good accuracy at higher frequencies leads to a novel design based on composite filters. The simple estimator structure also gives good insight into the fundamental accuracy limitations based on the sensors chosen. This paper defines the underlying mathematics, and quantifies performance for an estimator for shoulder, upper arm, lower arm and hand orientations. Good estimation accuracy up to 15 Hz is indicated, and this with a reduced total sensor count of 18 compared to 24 that would be required for more conventional estimator architectures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tbme.2007.912647

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 12 · Cited by 98

Authors
Hyde, R. A., Ketteringham, L. P., Neild, S. A., & Jones, R. J. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • Bristol General Hospital (GB)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
Published
2008-02
Volume
55
Issue
2
Pages
746-754
ISSN
0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2162271214
Cited by
98
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
17.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Inertial Sensor and Navigation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Target Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Keywords
sensor fusion, composite filter, tremor quantification, multiple sclerosis, estimation accuracy, wearable motion sensing
MeSH terms
Acceleration, Algorithms, Biomechanical Phenomena, Computer Simulation, Humans, Models, Biological, Orientation, Sensitivity and Specificity, Transducers, Reproducibility of Results, Upper Extremity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review