The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Generic and Robust System for Automated Patient-Specific Classification of ECG Signals
Abstract
This paper presents a generic and patient-specific classification system designed for robust and accurate detection of ECG heartbeat patterns. The proposed feature extraction process utilizes morphological wavelet transform features, which are projected onto a lower dimensional feature space using principal component analysis, and temporal features from the ECG data. For the pattern recognition unit, feedforward and fully connected artificial neural networks, which are optimally designed for each patient by the proposed multidimensional particle swarm optimization technique, are employed. By using relatively small common and patient-specific training data, the proposed classification system can adapt to significant interpatient variations in ECG patterns by training the optimal network structure, and thus, achieves higher accuracy over larger datasets. The classification experiments over a benchmark database demonstrate that the proposed system achieves such average accuracies and sensitivities better than most of the current state-of-the-art algorithms for detection of ventricular ectopic beats (VEBs) and supra-VEBs (SVEBs). Over the entire database, the average accuracy-sensitivity performances of the proposed system for VEB and SVEB detections are 98.3%-84.6% and 97.4%-63.5%, respectively. Finally, due to its parameter-invariant nature, the proposed system is highly generic, and thus, applicable to any ECG dataset.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Real-Time QRS Detection Algorithm
Pan, J., & Tompkins, W. J. (1985) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.1985.325532 · Cited by 7,855
Cited by
Real-Time Patient-Specific ECG Classification by 1-D Convolutional Neural Networks
Kiranyaz, S., Ince, T., & Gabbouj, M. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2015.2468589 · Cited by 1,912
Self-citationECG beat classification using PCA, LDA, ICA and Discrete Wavelet Transform
Martis, R. J., Acharya, U. R., & Min, L. C. (2013) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2013.01.005 · Cited by 722
Heartbeat Classification Using Morphological and Dynamic Features of ECG Signals
Ye, C., Kumar, B. V. K. V., & Coimbra, M. T. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2012.2213253 · Cited by 522
Major Advances in Particle Swarm Optimization: Theory, Analysis, and Application
Houssein, E. H., Gad, A. G., Hussain, K., & Suganthan, P. N. (2021) · Swarm and Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1016/j.swevo.2021.100868 · Cited by 466
RetractedA deep learning approach for ECG-based heartbeat classification for arrhythmia detection
Sannino, G., & De Pietro, G. (2018) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2018.03.057 · Cited by 445
Metadata
- Authors
- Ince, T., Kiranyaz, S., & Gabbouj, M.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
- Published
- 2009-05
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1415-1426
- ISSN
- 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2531
- OpenAlex
- W2162693370
- Cited by
- 481
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.