The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Compressed Sensing of EEG for Wireless Telemonitoring With Low Energy Consumption and Inexpensive Hardware
Open accessAbstract
Telemonitoring of electroencephalogram (EEG) through wireless body-area networks is an evolving direction in personalized medicine. Among various constraints in designing such a system, three important constraints are energy consumption, data compression, and device cost. Conventional data compression methodologies, although effective in data compression, consumes significant energy and cannot reduce device cost. Compressed sensing (CS), as an emerging data compression methodology, is promising in catering to these constraints. However, EEG is nonsparse in the time domain and also nonsparse in transformed domains (such as the wavelet domain). Therefore, it is extremely difficult for current CS algorithms to recover EEG with the quality that satisfies the requirements of clinical diagnosis and engineering applications. Recently, block sparse Bayesian learning (BSBL) was proposed as a new method to the CS problem. This study introduces the technique to the telemonitoring of EEG. Experimental results show that its recovery quality is better than state-of-the-art CS algorithms, and sufficient for practical use. These results suggest that BSBL is very promising for telemonitoring of EEG and other nonsparse physiological signals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009 · Cited by 24,371
Self-citationMean squared error: Love it or leave it? A new look at Signal Fidelity Measures
Wang, Z., & Bovik, A. C. (2009) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2008.930649 · Cited by 3,175
Cited by
A Survey on Wireless Body Area Networks: Technologies and Design Challenges
Cavallari, R., Martelli, F., Rosini, R., Buratti, C., & Verdone, R. (2014) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/surv.2014.012214.00007 · Cited by 710
Zhang, Z., Jung, T.-P., Makeig, S., & Rao, B. D. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2012.2226175 · Cited by 340
Self-citationPham, N., Jia, H., Tran, M., Dinh, T., Bui, N., Kwon, Y., Ma, D., Nguyen, P., Mascolo, C., & Vu, T. (2022) · Proceedings of the 28th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing And Networking · doi:10.1145/3495243.3560533 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, Z., Jung, T.-P., Makeig, S., & Rao, B. D.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
- Published
- 2013-01
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 221-224
- ISSN
- 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2531
- OpenAlex
- W1995513458
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 22.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.