The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
From Passive Tool Holders to Microsurgeons: Safer, Smaller, Smarter Surgical Robots
Abstract
Within only a few decades from its initial introduction, the field of surgical robotics has evolved into a dynamic and rapidly growing research area with increasing clinical uptake worldwide. Initially introduced for stereotaxic neurosurgery, surgical robots are now involved in an increasing number of procedures, demonstrating their practical clinical potential while propelling further advances in surgical innovations. Emerging platforms are also able to perform complex interventions through only a single-entry incision, and navigate through natural anatomical pathways in a tethered or wireless fashion. New devices facilitate superhuman dexterity and enable the performance of surgical steps that are otherwise impossible. They also allow seamless integration of microimaging techniques at the cellular level, significantly expanding the capabilities of surgeons. This paper provides an overview of the significant achievements in surgical robotics and identifies the current trends and future research directions of the field in making surgical robots safer, smaller, and smarter.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cappato, R., Calkins, H., Chen, S.-A., Davies, W., Iesaka, Y., Kalman, J., Kim, Y.-H., Klein, G., Natale, A., Packer, D., et al. (2010) · Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology · doi:10.1161/circep.109.859116 · Cited by 2,852
A Steady-Hand Robotic System for Microsurgical Augmentation
Taylor, R., Jensen, P., Whitcomb, L., Barnes, A., Kumar, R., Stoianovici, D., Gupta, P., Wang, Z., Dejuan, E., & Kavoussi, L. (1999) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/02783649922067807 · Cited by 528
Evidence from Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review
Ficarra, V., Cavalleri, S., Novara, G., Aragona, M., & Artibani, W. (2007) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2006.06.017 · Cited by 378
Applied force during vitreoretinal microsurgery with handheld instruments
Jagtap, A. D., & Riviere, C. N. (2005) · The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · doi:10.1109/iembs.2004.1403792 · Cited by 79
Cited by
The grand challenges of Science Robotics
Yang, G.-Z., Bellingham, J., Dupont, P. E., Fischer, P., Floridi, L., Full, R., Jacobstein, N., Kumar, V., McNutt, M., Merrifield, R., et al. (2018) · Science Robotics · doi:10.1126/scirobotics.aar7650 · Cited by 1,177
Self-citationShape Sensing Techniques for Continuum Robots in Minimally Invasive Surgery: A Survey
Shi, C., Luo, X., Qi, P., Li, T., Song, S., Najdovski, Z., Fukuda, T., & Ren, H. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2016.2622361 · Cited by 420
A Quaternion Weighted Fourier Linear Combiner for Modeling Physiological Tremor
Adhikari, K., Tatinati, S., Ang, W. T., Veluvolu, K. C., & Nazarpour, K. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2016.2530564 · Cited by 48
Endovascular Microrobotics for Neurointervention
Santiago-Dieppa, D. R., & Friend, J. (2024) · Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1146/annurev-control-060523-010720 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Bergeles, C., & Yang, G.-Z.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
- Published
- 2014-05
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1565-1576
- ISSN
- 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2531
- OpenAlex
- W2134178143
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 9.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.