The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Logistic Regression-HSMM-based Heart Sound Segmentation
Abstract
The identification of the exact positions of the first and second heart sounds within a phonocardiogram (PCG), or heart sound segmentation, is an essential step in the automatic analysis of heart sound recordings, allowing for the classification of pathological events. While threshold-based segmentation methods have shown modest success, probabilistic models, such as hidden Markov models, have recently been shown to surpass the capabilities of previous methods. Segmentation performance is further improved when a priori information about the expected duration of the states is incorporated into the model, such as in a hidden semi-Markov model (HSMM). This paper addresses the problem of the accurate segmentation of the first and second heart sound within noisy real-world PCG recordings using an HSMM, extended with the use of logistic regression for emission probability estimation. In addition, we implement a modified Viterbi algorithm for decoding the most likely sequence of states, and evaluated this method on a large dataset of 10,172 s of PCG recorded from 112 patients (including 12,181 first and 11,627 second heart sounds). The proposed method achieved an average F1 score of 95.63 ± 0.85%, while the current state of the art achieved 86.28 ± 1.55% when evaluated on unseen test recordings. The greater discrimination between states afforded using logistic regression as opposed to the previous Gaussian distribution-based emission probability estimation as well as the use of an extended Viterbi algorithm allows this method to significantly outperform the current state-of-the-art method based on a two-sided paired t-test.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition
Rabiner, L. R. (1989) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.18626 · Cited by 22,743
Goldberger, A. L., Amaral, L. A. N., Glass, L., Hausdorff, J. M., Ivanov, P. C., Mark, R. G., Mietus, J. E., Moody, G. B., Peng, C.-K., & Stanley, H. E. (2000) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.101.23.e215 · Cited by 14,809
Cited by
An open access database for the evaluation of heart sound algorithms
Liu, C., Springer, D., Li, Q., Moody, B., Juan, R. A., Chorro, F. J., Castells, F., Roig, J. M., Silva, I., Johnson, A. E. W., et al. (2016) · Physiological Measurement · doi:10.1088/0967-3334/37/12/2181 · Cited by 820
Self-citationStudies on biomedical signal processing: a review
Jalagam, M. K., & Mittal, V. K. (2024) · AIP Conference Proceedings · doi:10.1063/5.0159010 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Springer, D., Tarassenko, L., & Clifford, G.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
- Published
- 2015
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1-1
- ISSN
- 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2531
- OpenAlex
- W2301158262
- Cited by
- 518
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 27.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Logistic Regression-HSMM-based Heart Sound Segmentation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tbme.2015.2475278
- The paper
- Springer, D., Tarassenko, L., & Clifford, G. (2015). Logistic Regression-HSMM-based Heart Sound Segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/tbme.2015.2475278
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.