Noninvasive Electromagnetic Source Imaging and Granger Causality Analysis: An Electrophysiological Connectome (eConnectome) Approach
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: Combined source-imaging techniques and directional connectivity analysis can provide useful information about the underlying brain networks in a noninvasive fashion. Source-imaging techniques have been used successfully to either determine the source of activity or to extract source time-courses for Granger causality analysis, previously. In this work, we utilize source-imaging algorithms to both find the network nodes [regions of interest (ROI)] and then extract the activation time series for further Granger causality analysis. The aim of this work is to find network nodes objectively from noninvasive electromagnetic signals, extract activation time-courses, and apply Granger analysis on the extracted series to study brain networks under realistic conditions. METHODS: Source-imaging methods are used to identify network nodes and extract time-courses and then Granger causality analysis is applied to delineate the directional functional connectivity of underlying brain networks. Computer simulations studies where the underlying network (nodes and connectivity pattern) is known were performed; additionally, this approach has been evaluated in partial epilepsy patients to study epilepsy networks from interictal and ictal signals recorded by EEG and/or Magnetoencephalography (MEG). RESULTS: Localization errors of network nodes are less than 5 mm and normalized connectivity errors of ∼20% in estimating underlying brain networks in simulation studies. Additionally, two focal epilepsy patients were studied and the identified nodes driving the epileptic network were concordant with clinical findings from intracranial recordings or surgical resection. CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that combined source-imaging algorithms with Granger causality analysis can identify underlying networks precisely (both in terms of network nodes location and internodal connectivity). SIGNIFICANCE: The combined source imaging and Granger analysis technique is an effective tool for studying normal or pathological brain conditions.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The eConnectome approach has stirred interest in studying pathological networks such as epilepsy, where determining the source that drives seizures is important.
“The eConnectome approach (104, 105) has stirred interest in studying pathological networks such as epilepsy, where determining the source that drives seizures is of particular importance (106).”
From Electrophysiological source imaging: A noninvasive window to brain dynamics (2018) · cites this paper as [105]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 125 · Cited by 59
- Authors
- Sohrabpour, A., Ye, S., Worrell, G. A., Zhang, W., & He, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Corresponding author
- He, Bin
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
- Published
- 2016-12
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2474-2487
- ISSN
- 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2531
- PMC
- PMC5152676
- OpenAlex
- W2529907792
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 125
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 3.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- NIH (R01NS096761, R01EB021027, R01EY023101, U01HL117664, S10OD021721)
- National Science Foundation (CBET-1450956, CBET-1264782)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- Granger causality, brain networks, magnetoencephalography, epilepsy surgery
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Computer Simulation, Electroencephalography, Epilepsy, Humans, Models, Neurological, Neural Pathways, Magnetoencephalography, Models, Statistical, Connectome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review